CPU
GPU
FirePro D500
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 5970
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro D500 is positioned at rank #226 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro D500
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 5970 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro D500 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | FirePro D500 | Radeon HD 5970 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (279mm) | Standard Size (305mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 5970 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 5970 holds the technical lead. Priced at $100 (vs $150), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 51.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro D500 | Radeon HD 5970 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+51.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro D500 and Radeon HD 5970
FirePro D500
The FirePro D500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,272 points.
Radeon HD 5970
The Radeon HD 5970 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 18 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1600 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 294W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,297 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro D500 scores 2,272 and the Radeon HD 5970 reaches 2,297 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro D500 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 5970 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (FirePro D500) vs 1,600 (Radeon HD 5970). Raw compute: 2.227 TFLOPS (FirePro D500) vs 2.32 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 5970).
| Feature | FirePro D500 | Radeon HD 5970 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,272 | 2,297+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 1600 ×2+4% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.227 TFLOPS | 2.32 TFLOPS ×2+4% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 ×2 |
| TMUs | 96+20% | 80 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB+20% | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro D500 | Radeon HD 5970 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro D500 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 5970 has 2 GB. The FirePro D500 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (FirePro D500) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 5970) — the FirePro D500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro D500 | Radeon HD 5970 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro D500) vs 11.2 (Radeon HD 5970). Vulkan: 1.2 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro D500 | Radeon HD 5970 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12+7% | 11.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 6+100% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro D500) vs None (Radeon HD 5970). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro D500) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 5970).
| Feature | FirePro D500 | Radeon HD 5970 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | None |
| Decoder | UVD 3.2 | UVD 2.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro D500 draws 274W versus the Radeon HD 5970's 294W — a 7% difference. The FirePro D500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro D500) vs 650W (Radeon HD 5970). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 279mm vs 305mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 90.
| Feature | FirePro D500 | Radeon HD 5970 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 274W-7% | 294W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-46% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 279mm | 305mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-17% | 90 |
| Perf/Watt | 8.3+6% | 7.8 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro D500 launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Radeon HD 5970 launched at $699 and now averages $100. The Radeon HD 5970 costs 33.3% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 15.1 (FirePro D500) vs 23.0 (Radeon HD 5970) — the Radeon HD 5970 offers 52.3% better value. The FirePro D500 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2009).
| Feature | FirePro D500 | Radeon HD 5970 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500-28% | $699 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $100-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.1 | 23.0+52% |
| Codename | Tahiti | Hemlock |
| Release | January 18 2014 | November 18 2009 |
| Ranking | #484 | #651 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro D500 and Radeon HD 5970
