
FirePro D500

Radeon R7 250X
FirePro D500 vs Radeon R7 250X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro D500 vs Radeon R7 250X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro D500 vs Radeon R7 250X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro D500
2014Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌405.1% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.5 vs 22.9 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ❌242.5% higher power demand at 274W vs 80W.
- ❌32.9% longer card at 279mm vs 210mm.
Radeon R7 250X
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $401 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 404.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.9 vs 4.5 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 274W, a 194W reduction.
- ✅Measures 210mm instead of 279mm, a 69mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro D500 vs Radeon R7 250X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro D500
The FirePro D500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,272 points.

Radeon R7 250X
The Radeon R7 250X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 13 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,269 points. Launch price was $99.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro D500 scores 2,272 and the Radeon R7 250X reaches 2,269 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro D500 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R7 250X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (FirePro D500) vs 640 (Radeon R7 250X). Raw compute: 2.227 TFLOPS (FirePro D500) vs 1.216 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 250X).
| Feature | FirePro D500 | Radeon R7 250X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,272 | 2,269 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+140% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.227 TFLOPS+83% | 1.216 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 96+140% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB+140% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+200% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro D500 | Radeon R7 250X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro D500 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 250X carries 2 GB. FirePro D500 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro D500 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 250X. L2 Cache: 768 KB (FirePro D500) vs 256 KB (Radeon R7 250X) — the FirePro D500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro D500 | Radeon R7 250X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+200% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro D500) vs 12 (FL 11_1) (Radeon R7 250X). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro D500 | Radeon R7 250X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (FL 11_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+200% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro D500) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 250X). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro D500) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (Radeon R7 250X).
| Feature | FirePro D500 | Radeon R7 250X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 3.2 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro D500 draws 274W versus the Radeon R7 250X's 80W — a 109.6% difference. The Radeon R7 250X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro D500) vs 400W (Radeon R7 250X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 279mm vs 210mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | FirePro D500 | Radeon R7 250X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 274W | 80W-71% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-13% | 400W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 279mm | 210mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 8.3 | 28.4+242% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro D500 came in at $500, while the Radeon R7 250X launched at $99. On MSRP, Radeon R7 250X was 80.2% cheaper ($401 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.5 (FirePro D500) vs 22.9 (Radeon R7 250X) — the Radeon R7 250X offers 408.9% better value.
| Feature | FirePro D500 | Radeon R7 250X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $99-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.5 | 22.9+409% |
| Codename | Tahiti | Cape Verde |
| Release | January 18 2014 | February 13 2014 |
| Ranking | #484 | #655 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














