
FirePro V7900

GRID M60-1B
FirePro V7900 vs GRID M60-1B Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro V7900 vs GRID M60-1B FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro V7900 vs GRID M60-1B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro V7900
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,501 less on MSRP ($999 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 150.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.3 vs 0.9 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 225W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌27800% longer card at 279mm vs 1mm.
GRID M60-1B
2015Why buy it
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 279mm, a 278mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌150.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$999 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.9 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 225W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro V7900 vs GRID M60-1B Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro V7900
The FirePro V7900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,261 points.

GRID M60-1B
The GRID M60-1B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,256 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V7900 scores 2,261 and the GRID M60-1B reaches 2,256 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V7900 is built on TeraScale 3 while the GRID M60-1B uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V7900) vs 2,048 (GRID M60-1B). Raw compute: 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V7900) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-1B).
| Feature | FirePro V7900 | GRID M60-1B |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,261 | 2,256 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 2048+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.856 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS+160% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 80 | 128+60% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 768 KB+140% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro V7900 | GRID M60-1B |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V7900 and 64-bit on the GRID M60-1B. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro V7900) vs 2 MB (GRID M60-1B) — the GRID M60-1B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro V7900 | GRID M60-1B |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro V7900) vs 12_1 (GRID M60-1B). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | FirePro V7900 | GRID M60-1B |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 | 12_1+7% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V7900 draws 150W versus the GRID M60-1B's 225W — a 40% difference. The FirePro V7900 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V7900) vs 350W (GRID M60-1B). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 279mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | FirePro V7900 | GRID M60-1B |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-33% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 279mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 100°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 15.1+51% | 10.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro V7900 came in at $999, while the GRID M60-1B launched at $2500. On MSRP, FirePro V7900 was 60% cheaper ($1501 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.3 (FirePro V7900) vs 0.9 (GRID M60-1B) — the FirePro V7900 offers 155.6% better value. The newer card here is GRID M60-1B (2015 vs 2011).
| Feature | FirePro V7900 | GRID M60-1B |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999-60% | $2500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.3+156% | 0.9 |
| Codename | Cayman | GM204 |
| Release | May 24 2011 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #656 | #525 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














