CPU
GPU
FirePro V7900
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 560M SLI
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FirePro V7900 is positioned at rank 279 and the GeForce GTX 560M SLI is on rank 163, so the GeForce GTX 560M SLI offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro V7900
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 560M SLI
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 560M SLI is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro V7900.
| Insight | FirePro V7900 | GeForce GTX 560M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (279mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 560M SLI remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro V7900 and GeForce GTX 560M SLI
FirePro V7900
The FirePro V7900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,261 points.
GeForce GTX 560M SLI
The GeForce GTX 560M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 6 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 775 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,274 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro V7900 scores 2,261 and the GeForce GTX 560M SLI reaches 2,274 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V7900 is built on TeraScale 3 while the GeForce GTX 560M SLI uses Fermi, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro V7900) vs 384 (GeForce GTX 560M SLI).
| Feature | FirePro V7900 | GeForce GTX 560M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,261 | 2,274 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+233% | 384 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro V7900 | GeForce GTX 560M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | FirePro V7900 | GeForce GTX 560M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro V7900) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 560M SLI). Vulkan: None vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro V7900 | GeForce GTX 560M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 | 12 (11_0)+7% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.4+10% | 4.0 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (FirePro V7900) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 560M SLI). Decoder: UVD 3.1 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC (FirePro V7900) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 560M SLI).
| Feature | FirePro V7900 | GeForce GTX 560M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Decoder | UVD 3.1 | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro V7900 draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 560M SLI's 100W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GTX 560M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V7900) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 560M SLI). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 100°C vs 90°C.
| Feature | FirePro V7900 | GeForce GTX 560M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 100W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 279mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 100°C | 90°C-10% |
| Perf/Watt | 15.1 | 22.7+50% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro V7900 and GeForce GTX 560M SLI
