Quadro K3100M vs Radeon Pro

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K3100M vs Radeon Pro FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K3100M vs Radeon Pro: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K3100M

2013

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 75W instead of 250W, a 175W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon Pro

2020

Why buy it

✅58.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Quadro K3100M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon Pro is the less risky modern option long term.
✅More future proof: GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌233.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Pro is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 58.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.6% in PassMark G3D (2,366 vs 2,283), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Pro is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon Pro makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro K3100M vs Radeon Pro Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K3100M

The Quadro K3100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,283 points. Launch price was $1,999.

Radeon Pro

The Radeon Pro is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2020. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,366 points. Launch price was $1,899.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K3100M scores 2,283 and the Radeon Pro reaches 2,366 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K3100M is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro uses GCN 5.1, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 768 (Quadro K3100M) vs 3,840 (Radeon Pro). Raw compute: 1.084 TFLOPS (Quadro K3100M) vs 13.06 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro).

Feature	Quadro K3100M	Radeon Pro
G3D Mark Score	2,283	2,366+4%
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 5.1
Process Node	28 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	768	3840+400%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.084 TFLOPS	13.06 TFLOPS+1105%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	64	240+275%
L1 Cache	64 KB	960 KB+1400%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	4 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K3100M	Radeon Pro
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K3100M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro carries 2 GB. Quadro K3100M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K3100M and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Quadro K3100M) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro) — the Radeon Pro has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro K3100M	Radeon Pro
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	4 MB+700%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K3100M draws 75W versus the Radeon Pro's 250W — a 107.7% difference. The Quadro K3100M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K3100M) vs 350W (Radeon Pro). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro K3100M	Radeon Pro
TDP	75W-70%	250W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	241mm
Slots	—	1
Perf/Watt	30.4+220%	9.5

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon Pro (2020 vs 2013).

Feature	Quadro K3100M	Radeon Pro
MSRP	—	$0
Codename	GK104	Vega 20
Release	July 23 2013	May 13 2020
Ranking	#653	#194

Search Quadro K3100M on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.