Quadro M500M vs NVS 810
Quadro M500M
Popular choices:
NVS 810
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro M500M is positioned at rank 31 and the NVS 810 is on rank 309, so the Quadro M500M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro M500M
Performance Per Dollar NVS 810
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The NVS 810 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro M500M.
| Insight | Quadro M500M | NVS 810 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the NVS 810 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M500M and NVS 810
Quadro M500M
The Quadro M500M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 27 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,172 points.
NVS 810
The NVS 810 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,192 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M500M scores 1,172 and the NVS 810 reaches 1,192 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M500M is built on Maxwell while the NVS 810 uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Quadro M500M) vs 512 (NVS 810). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (Quadro M500M) vs 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 (NVS 810). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1033 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M500M | NVS 810 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,172 | 1,192+2% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 512 ×2+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8632 TFLOPS | 1.058 TFLOPS ×2+23% |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz+9% | 1033 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 16 ×2+100% |
| TMUs | 16 | 32 ×2+100% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 256 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M500M | NVS 810 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M500M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the NVS 810 has 4 GB. The NVS 810 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Quadro M500M | NVS 810 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M500M draws 30W versus the NVS 810's 68W — a 77.6% difference. The Quadro M500M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M500M) vs 350W (NVS 810). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro M500M | NVS 810 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-56% | 68W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 198mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 39.1+123% | 17.5 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro M500M is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | Quadro M500M | NVS 810 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $700 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $80 |
| Codename | GM108 | GM107 |
| Release | April 27 2016 | November 4 2015 |
| Ranking | #833 | #826 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro M500M and NVS 810
