Quadro M5500 vs Arc A530M
Quadro M5500
Popular choices:
Arc A530M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro M5500 is positioned at rank 141 and the Arc A530M is on rank 243, so the Quadro M5500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro M5500
Performance Per Dollar Arc A530M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc A530M is significantly newer (2023 vs 2016). The Arc A530M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro M5500 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc A530M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro M5500 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro M5500 | Arc A530M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Arc A530M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M5500 and Arc A530M
Quadro M5500
The Quadro M5500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 8 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1140 MHz to 1165 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,915 points.
Arc A530M
The Arc A530M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 1 2023. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1300 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,013 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M5500 scores 7,915 and the Arc A530M reaches 8,013 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M5500 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Arc A530M uses Generation 12.7, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Quadro M5500) vs 1,536 (Arc A530M). Raw compute: 4.772 TFLOPS (Quadro M5500) vs 3.994 TFLOPS (Arc A530M). Boost clocks: 1165 MHz vs 1300 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M5500 | Arc A530M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,915 | 8,013+1% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+33% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.772 TFLOPS+19% | 3.994 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1165 MHz | 1300 MHz+12% |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 128+33% | 96 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 8 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M5500 | Arc A530M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M5500 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Arc A530M has 4 GB. The Quadro M5500 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro M5500) vs 8 MB (Arc A530M) — the Arc A530M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro M5500 | Arc A530M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 8 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro M5500) vs 12.2 (Arc A530M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro M5500 | Arc A530M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M5500) vs Xe Media Engine (Arc A530M). Decoder: NVDEC (Maxwell) vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro M5500) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A530M).
| Feature | Quadro M5500 | Arc A530M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Maxwell) | Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Maxwell) | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M5500 draws 150W versus the Arc A530M's 65W — a 79.1% difference. The Arc A530M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M5500) vs 500W (Arc A530M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 80°C.
| Feature | Quadro M5500 | Arc A530M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 65W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 52.8 | 123.3+134% |
Value Analysis
The Arc A530M is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro M5500 | Arc A530M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $800 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200 | — |
| Codename | GM204 | DG2-256 |
| Release | April 8 2016 | August 1 2023 |
| Ranking | #321 | #317 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro M5500 and Arc A530M
