Quadro M5500 vs Radeon Pro V520

CPU

GPU

Quadro M5500

2016Core: 1140 MHzBoost: 1165 MHz

Buy on Amazon

Radeon Pro V520

2020Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1600 MHz

Buy on Amazon

Quadro M5500 vs Radeon Pro V520 Performance Spectrum

Quadro M5500

8 GB 150

7,915

0.0%

GeForce GTX 660 Ti

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

GeForce GTX 960

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

Radeon Pro V520

4 GB 225

8,000

+1.1%

Radeon HD 7870 XT

Radeon RX 6300

Radeon R9 380X

Radeon RX 470 (móvel)

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro M5500 vs Radeon Pro V520 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro M5500 vs Radeon Pro V520: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro M5500

2016

Why buy it

✅34.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅Draws 150W instead of 225W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Radeon Pro V520

2020

Why buy it

✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro M5500 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌50% higher power demand at 225W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro M5500 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 34.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon Pro V520 instead at 8,000 vs 7,915, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Pro V520 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2016. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon Pro V520 makes the most sense to buy today. It is priced the same on MSRP at $800 vs $800, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1.1% (10.0 vs 9.9), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro M5500 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro M5500 vs Radeon Pro V520 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro M5500

The Quadro M5500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 8 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1140 MHz to 1165 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,915 points.

Radeon Pro V520

The Radeon Pro V520 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1600 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,000 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro M5500 scores 7,915 and the Radeon Pro V520 reaches 8,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M5500 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro V520 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Quadro M5500) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro V520). Raw compute: 4.772 TFLOPS (Quadro M5500) vs 7.373 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro V520). Boost clocks: 1165 MHz vs 1600 MHz.

Feature	Quadro M5500	Radeon Pro V520
G3D Mark Score	7,915	8,000+1%
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	2048	2304+13%
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.772 TFLOPS	7.373 TFLOPS+55%
Boost Clock	1165 MHz	1600 MHz+37%
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	128	144+13%
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro M5500	Radeon Pro V520
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro M5500 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro V520 carries 4 GB. Quadro M5500 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro M5500 and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro V520. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro M5500) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro V520) — the Radeon Pro V520 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro M5500	Radeon Pro V520
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro M5500) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro V520). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	Quadro M5500	Radeon Pro V520
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12.1
Vulkan	1.2+9%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M5500) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro V520). Decoder: NVDEC (Maxwell) vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro M5500) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro V520).

Feature	Quadro M5500	Radeon Pro V520
Encoder	NVENC (Maxwell)	VCN 2.0
Decoder	NVDEC (Maxwell)	VCN 2.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1	H.264,H.265,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M5500 draws 150W versus the Radeon Pro V520's 225W — a 40% difference. The Quadro M5500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M5500) vs 350W (Radeon Pro V520). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 85°C.

Feature	Quadro M5500	Radeon Pro V520
TDP	150W-33%	225W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	267mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	85	85°C
Perf/Watt	52.8+48%	35.6

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro M5500 came in at $800, while the Radeon Pro V520 launched at $800. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.9 (Quadro M5500) vs 10.0 (Radeon Pro V520) — the Radeon Pro V520 offers 1% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro V520 (2020 vs 2016).

Feature	Quadro M5500	Radeon Pro V520
MSRP	$800	$800
Performance per Dollar	9.9	10.0+1%
Codename	GM204	Navi 12
Release	April 8 2016	December 1 2020
Ranking	#321	#218

Search Quadro M5500 on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro V520 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.