Quadro K6000
Quadro M5500
Quadro K6000 vs Quadro M5500 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro K6000 vs Quadro M5500 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro K6000 vs Quadro M5500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro K6000
2013Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro M5500 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2013 hardware with 12 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌558.1% HIGHER MSRP$5,265 MSRPvs$800 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.5 vs 9.9 G3D/$ ($5,265 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 225W vs 150W.
Quadro M5500
2016Why buy it
- ✅7.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $4,465 less on MSRP ($800 MSRP vs $5,265 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 551.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.9 vs 1.5 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs $5,265 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 225W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro K6000 vs Quadro M5500 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Quadro K6000
The Quadro K6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 797 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,993 points. Launch price was $5,265.
Quadro M5500
The Quadro M5500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 8 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1140 MHz to 1165 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,915 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K6000 scores 7,993 and the Quadro M5500 reaches 7,915 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K6000 is built on Kepler while the Quadro M5500 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,880 (Quadro K6000) vs 2,048 (Quadro M5500). Raw compute: 5.196 TFLOPS (Quadro K6000) vs 4.772 TFLOPS (Quadro M5500). Boost clocks: 902 MHz vs 1165 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro K6000 | Quadro M5500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,993 | 7,915 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2880+41% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.196 TFLOPS+9% | 4.772 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 902 MHz | 1165 MHz+29% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 240+88% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 240 KB | 768 KB+220% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K6000 | Quadro M5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro K6000 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M5500 carries 8 GB. Quadro K6000 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro K6000 and 256-bit on the Quadro M5500. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Quadro K6000) vs 2 MB (Quadro M5500) — the Quadro M5500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro K6000 | Quadro M5500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (Quadro K6000) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro M5500). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro K6000 | Quadro M5500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12 (12_1)+9% |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1.0 (Quadro K6000) vs NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M5500). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs NVDEC (Maxwell). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (Quadro K6000) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro M5500).
| Feature | Quadro K6000 | Quadro M5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1.0 | NVENC (Maxwell) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | NVDEC (Maxwell) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | H.264,H.265,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K6000 draws 225W versus the Quadro M5500's 150W — a 40% difference. The Quadro M5500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K6000) vs 350W (Quadro M5500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 265mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85.
| Feature | Quadro K6000 | Quadro M5500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 150W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 265mm | 0mm |
| Height | 110mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 35.5 | 52.8+49% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro K6000 came in at $5265, while the Quadro M5500 launched at $800. On MSRP, Quadro M5500 was 84.8% cheaper ($4465 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.5 (Quadro K6000) vs 9.9 (Quadro M5500) — the Quadro M5500 offers 560% better value. The newer card here is Quadro M5500 (2016 vs 2013).
| Feature | Quadro K6000 | Quadro M5500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5265 | $800-85% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.5 | 9.9+560% |
| Codename | GK110B | GM204 |
| Release | July 23 2013 | April 8 2016 |
| Ranking | #318 | #321 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro K6000 and Quadro M5500
