Quadro K6000 vs Radeon 890M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K6000 vs Radeon 890M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K6000 vs Radeon 890M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K6000

2013

Why buy it

✅31.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($5,265 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 12 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌1400% higher power demand at 225W vs 15W.

Radeon 890M

2024

Why buy it

✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 225W, a 210W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro K6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $5,265 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro K6000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 31.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon 890M instead at 8,175 vs 7,993, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 890M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 28nm, 16 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2013. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro K6000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro K6000 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon 890M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro K6000 vs Radeon 890M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K6000

The Quadro K6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 797 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,993 points. Launch price was $5,265.

Radeon 890M

The Radeon 890M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,175 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K6000 scores 7,993 and the Radeon 890M reaches 8,175 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K6000 is built on Kepler while the Radeon 890M uses RDNA 3.5, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,880 (Quadro K6000) vs 1,024 (Radeon 890M). Raw compute: 5.196 TFLOPS (Quadro K6000) vs 5.939 TFLOPS (Radeon 890M). Boost clocks: 902 MHz vs 2900 MHz.

Feature	Quadro K6000	Radeon 890M
G3D Mark Score	7,993	8,175+2%
Architecture	Kepler	RDNA 3.5
Process Node	28 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	2880+181%	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.196 TFLOPS	5.939 TFLOPS+14%
Boost Clock	902 MHz	2900 MHz+222%
ROPs	48+50%	32
TMUs	240+275%	64
L1 Cache	240 KB	256 KB+7%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	2 MB+33%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K6000	Radeon 890M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K6000 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 890M carries 4 GB. Quadro K6000 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro K6000 and System on the Radeon 890M. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Quadro K6000) vs 2 MB (Radeon 890M) — the Radeon 890M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro K6000	Radeon 890M
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+200%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	211 GB/s	System
Bus Width	256-bit	System
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	2 MB+33%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (Quadro K6000) vs 12.2 (Radeon 890M). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro K6000	Radeon 890M
DirectX	11.0	12.2+11%
Vulkan	1.1	1.3+18%
OpenGL	4.5	4.6+2%
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1.0 (Quadro K6000) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon 890M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (Quadro K6000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon 890M).

Feature	Quadro K6000	Radeon 890M
Encoder	NVENC 1.0	VCN 3.0
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP5	VCN 3.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K6000 draws 225W versus the Radeon 890M's 15W — a 175% difference. The Radeon 890M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K6000) vs 500W (Radeon 890M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 265mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

Feature	Quadro K6000	Radeon 890M
TDP	225W	15W-93%
Recommended PSU	350W-30%	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	265mm	0mm
Height	110mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	35.5	545.0+1435%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon 890M (2024 vs 2013).

Feature	Quadro K6000	Radeon 890M
MSRP	$5265	—
Codename	GK110B	Strix Point
Release	July 23 2013	July 15 2024
Ranking	#318	#312

Search Quadro K6000 on Amazon

Search Radeon 890M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.