Quadro K6000 vs Radeon RX 580 (móvel)

NVIDIA

Quadro K6000

2013Core: 797 MHzBoost: 902 MHz
Similar parts
···
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 580 (móvel)

2017Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1077 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro K6000 vs Radeon RX 580 (móvel) Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K6000 vs Radeon RX 580 (móvel) FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K6000 vs Radeon RX 580 (móvel): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K6000

2013

Why buy it

  • 18.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • 2013 hardware with 12 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 2199.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $5,265 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.5 vs 34.9 G3D/$ ($5,265 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
  • 125% higher power demand at 225W vs 100W.

Radeon RX 580 (móvel)

2017

Why buy it

  • Costs $5,036 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $5,265 MSRP).
  • Delivers 2201.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 34.9 vs 1.5 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $5,265 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • Quadro K6000 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Radeon RX 580 (móvel) is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 100W instead of 225W, a 125W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro K6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro K6000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 18.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon RX 580 (móvel) instead at 8,000 vs 7,993, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX 580 (móvel) is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer feature stack, with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) and FSR Frame Generation (2023), while Quadro K6000 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 580 (móvel) makes the most sense to buy today. It is $5,036 cheaper on MSRP at $229 vs $5,265, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2201.1% (34.9 vs 1.5), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro K6000 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro K6000 vs Radeon RX 580 (móvel) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro K6000

The Quadro K6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 797 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,993 points. Launch price was $5,265.

AMD

Radeon RX 580 (móvel)

The Radeon RX 580 (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1077 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,000 points. Launch price was $301.69.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K6000 scores 7,993 and the Radeon RX 580 (móvel) reaches 8,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K6000 is built on Kepler while the Radeon RX 580 (móvel) uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,880 (Quadro K6000) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 580 (móvel)). Raw compute: 5.196 TFLOPS (Quadro K6000) vs 4.963 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 580 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 902 MHz vs 1077 MHz.

FeatureQuadro K6000Radeon RX 580 (móvel)
G3D Mark Score
7,993
8,000
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
2880+25%
2304
Compute (TFLOPS)
5.196 TFLOPS+5%
4.963 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
902 MHz
1077 MHz+19%
ROPs
48+50%
32
TMUs
240+67%
144
L1 Cache
240 KB
576 KB+140%
L2 Cache
1.5 MB
2 MB+33%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 580 (móvel) is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Quadro K6000 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

FeatureQuadro K6000Radeon RX 580 (móvel)
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K6000 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 580 (móvel) carries 4 GB. Quadro K6000 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 211 GB/s (Quadro K6000) vs 256 GB/s (Radeon RX 580 (móvel)) — a 21.3% advantage for the Radeon RX 580 (móvel). Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro K6000 and 256-bit on the Radeon RX 580 (móvel). L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Quadro K6000) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 580 (móvel)) — the Radeon RX 580 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro K6000Radeon RX 580 (móvel)
VRAM Capacity
12 GB+200%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
211 GB/s
256 GB/s+21%
Bus Width
256-bit
256-bit
L2 Cache
1.5 MB
2 MB+33%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (Quadro K6000) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon RX 580 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureQuadro K6000Radeon RX 580 (móvel)
DirectX
11.0
12 (12_0)+9%
Vulkan
1.1
1.3+18%
OpenGL
4.5
4.6+2%
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1.0 (Quadro K6000) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 580 (móvel)). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (Quadro K6000) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon RX 580 (móvel)).

FeatureQuadro K6000Radeon RX 580 (móvel)
Encoder
NVENC 1.0
VCE 3.4
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP5
UVD 6.3
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264
H.264,H.265
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K6000 draws 225W versus the Radeon RX 580 (móvel)'s 100W — a 76.9% difference. The Radeon RX 580 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K6000) vs 350W (Radeon RX 580 (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 265mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80.

FeatureQuadro K6000Radeon RX 580 (móvel)
TDP
225W
100W-56%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
265mm
0mm
Height
110mm
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
80°C
80
Perf/Watt
35.5
80.0+125%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro K6000 came in at $5265, while the Radeon RX 580 (móvel) launched at $229. On MSRP, Radeon RX 580 (móvel) was 95.7% cheaper ($5036 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.5 (Quadro K6000) vs 34.9 (Radeon RX 580 (móvel)) — the Radeon RX 580 (móvel) offers 2226.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 580 (móvel) (2017 vs 2013).

FeatureQuadro K6000Radeon RX 580 (móvel)
MSRP
$5265
$229-96%
Performance per Dollar
1.5
34.9+2227%
Codename
GK110B
Polaris 20
Release
July 23 2013
April 18 2017
Ranking
#318
#338

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.