Quadro K6000
Radeon RX 470/570
Quadro K6000 vs Radeon RX 470/570 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro K6000 vs Radeon RX 470/570 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro K6000 vs Radeon RX 470/570: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro K6000
2013Why buy it
- ✅0.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 12 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌2841.3% HIGHER MSRP$5,265 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.5 vs 44.3 G3D/$ ($5,265 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ❌87.5% higher power demand at 225W vs 120W.
- ❌10.4% longer card at 265mm vs 240mm.
Radeon RX 470/570
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,086 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $5,265 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2820% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.3 vs 1.5 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $5,265 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 225W, a 105W reduction.
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 265mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro K6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro K6000 vs Radeon RX 470/570 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Quadro K6000
The Quadro K6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 797 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,993 points. Launch price was $5,265.
Radeon RX 470/570
The Radeon RX 470/570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 926 MHz to 1206 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,935 points. Launch price was $179.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K6000 scores 7,993 and the Radeon RX 470/570 reaches 7,935 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K6000 is built on Kepler while the Radeon RX 470/570 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,880 (Quadro K6000) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 470/570). Raw compute: 5.196 TFLOPS (Quadro K6000) vs 4.94 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 470/570). Boost clocks: 902 MHz vs 1206 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro K6000 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,993 | 7,935 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2880+41% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.196 TFLOPS+5% | 4.94 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 902 MHz | 1206 MHz+34% |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 240+88% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 240 KB | 512 KB+113% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K6000 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro K6000 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 470/570 carries 8 GB. Quadro K6000 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 211 GB/s (Quadro K6000) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 470/570) — a 6.2% advantage for the Radeon RX 470/570. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro K6000 and 256-bit on the Radeon RX 470/570. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Quadro K6000) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 470/570) — the Radeon RX 470/570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro K6000 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 211 GB/s | 224 GB/s+6% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (Quadro K6000) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX 470/570). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro K6000 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12.0+9% |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1.0 (Quadro K6000) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 470/570). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (Quadro K6000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 470/570).
| Feature | Quadro K6000 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1.0 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K6000 draws 225W versus the Radeon RX 470/570's 120W — a 60.9% difference. The Radeon RX 470/570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K6000) vs 450W (Radeon RX 470/570). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin. Card length: 265mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Quadro K6000 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 120W-47% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin |
| Length | 265mm | 240mm |
| Height | 110mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 35.5 | 66.1+86% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro K6000 came in at $5265, while the Radeon RX 470/570 launched at $179. On MSRP, Radeon RX 470/570 was 96.6% cheaper ($5086 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.5 (Quadro K6000) vs 44.3 (Radeon RX 470/570) — the Radeon RX 470/570 offers 2853.3% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 470/570 (2016 vs 2013).
| Feature | Quadro K6000 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5265 | $179-97% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.5 | 44.3+2853% |
| Codename | GK110B | Ellesmere |
| Release | July 23 2013 | August 4 2016 |
| Ranking | #318 | #315 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro K6000 and Radeon RX 470/570
