
Quadro K6000 vs Radeon Pro 5500 XT

Quadro K6000
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 5500 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro K6000 is positioned at rank 319 and the Radeon Pro 5500 XT is on rank 29, so the Radeon Pro 5500 XT offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K6000
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 5500 XT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro 5500 XT is significantly newer (2020 vs 2013). The Radeon Pro 5500 XT likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro K6000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro K6000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (12 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro 5500 XT.
| Insight | Quadro K6000 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+200%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (265mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro 5500 XT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $100 versus $300 for the Quadro K6000, it costs 67% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 196.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro K6000 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+196.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) | ✅More affordable ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K6000 and Radeon Pro 5500 XT

Quadro K6000
The Quadro K6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 797 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,993 points. Launch price was $5,265.

Radeon Pro 5500 XT
The Radeon Pro 5500 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1187 MHz to 1757 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,910 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K6000 scores 7,993 and the Radeon Pro 5500 XT reaches 7,910 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K6000 is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro 5500 XT uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,880 (Quadro K6000) vs 1,536 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT). Raw compute: 5.196 TFLOPS (Quadro K6000) vs 5.398 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5500 XT). Boost clocks: 902 MHz vs 1757 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro K6000 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,993+1% | 7,910 |
| Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2880+88% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.196 TFLOPS | 5.398 TFLOPS+4% |
| Boost Clock | 902 MHz | 1757 MHz+95% |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 240+150% | 96 |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K6000 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro K6000 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5500 XT has 4 GB. The Quadro K6000 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Quadro K6000) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) — the Radeon Pro 5500 XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro K6000 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+200% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (Quadro K6000) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Quadro K6000 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12.1+10% |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.4+27% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1.0 (Quadro K6000) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (Quadro K6000) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT).
| Feature | Quadro K6000 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K6000 draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro 5500 XT's 125W — a 57.1% difference. The Radeon Pro 5500 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K6000) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 5500 XT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro K6000 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 125W-44% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 265mm | — |
| Height | 110mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 35.5 | 63.3+78% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro K6000 launched at $5265 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the Radeon Pro 5500 XT launched at $199 and now averages $100. The Radeon Pro 5500 XT costs 66.7% less ($200 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 26.6 (Quadro K6000) vs 79.1 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) — the Radeon Pro 5500 XT offers 197.4% better value. The Radeon Pro 5500 XT is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2013).
| Feature | Quadro K6000 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5265 | $199-96% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300 | $100-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.6 | 79.1+197% |
| Codename | GK110B | Navi 14 |
| Release | July 23 2013 | August 4 2020 |
| Ranking | #318 | #322 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












