
Quadro K6000 vs GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)

Quadro K6000
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro K6000 is positioned at rank 319 and the GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) is on rank 11, so the GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K6000
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) is significantly newer (2023 vs 2013). The GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro K6000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro K6000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro K6000 | GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) (5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (265mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K6000 and GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)

Quadro K6000
The Quadro K6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 797 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,993 points. Launch price was $5,265.

GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)
The GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1545 MHz to 1890 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,160 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K6000 scores 7,993 and the GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) reaches 8,160 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K6000 is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,880 (Quadro K6000) vs 3,072 (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)). Raw compute: 5.196 TFLOPS (Quadro K6000) vs 11.61 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)). Boost clocks: 902 MHz vs 1890 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro K6000 | GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,993 | 8,160+2% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2880 | 3072+7% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.196 TFLOPS | 11.61 TFLOPS+123% |
| Boost Clock | 902 MHz | 1890 MHz+110% |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 240+150% | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 0.23 MB | 3 MB+1204% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 32 MB+2033% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K6000 | GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro K6000 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) has 6 GB. The Quadro K6000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 211 GB/s (Quadro K6000) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)) — a 9.9% advantage for the Quadro K6000. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Quadro K6000) vs 32 MB (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)) — the GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro K6000 | GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+100% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 211 GB/s+10% | 192 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 32 MB+2033% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (Quadro K6000) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro K6000 | GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12+9% |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1.0 (Quadro K6000) vs NVENC 6th Gen (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs NVDEC 3rd Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (Quadro K6000) vs H.264,H.265 (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)).
| Feature | Quadro K6000 | GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1.0 | NVENC 6th Gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | NVDEC 3rd Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K6000 draws 225W versus the GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)'s 115W — a 64.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K6000) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 265mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70.
| Feature | Quadro K6000 | GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 115W-49% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 265mm | 0mm |
| Height | 110mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 70-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 35.5 | 71.0+100% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2013).
| Feature | Quadro K6000 | GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5265 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300 | — |
| Codename | GK110B | AD107 |
| Release | July 23 2013 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #318 | #102 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












