Quadro K6000
VS
GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)

Quadro K6000 vs GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)

NVIDIA

Quadro K6000

2013Core: 797 MHzBoost: 902 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)

2023Core: 1545 MHzBoost: 1890 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro K6000 is positioned at rank 319 and the GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) is on rank 11, so the GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro K6000

#303
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
9719%
#318
FirePro V8800
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $100
100%
#319
Quadro K6000
MSRP: $5265|Avg: $300
100%
#320
NVS 510
MSRP: $449|Avg: $15
99%
#321
GRID M60-1Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $50
97%
#322
GRID K280Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $50
93%
#323
FirePro M2000
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
93%
#324
Tesla K20c
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $500
91%
#325
GRID M6-1Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
91%
#326
Quadro FX 380
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
90%
#327
Tesla C2050 / C2070
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $30
90%
#328
FirePro M7740
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
88%
#329
Quadro FX 570
MSRP: $199|Avg: $15
86%
#330
RTXA5000-24Q
MSRP: $3721|Avg: $2100
85%
#331
GRID P40-1Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
84%
#333
Tesla M10
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)

#6
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
113%
#8
103%
#9
102%
#11
GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#13
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
93%
#14
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
92%
#18
Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
MSRP: $55|Avg: $55
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) is significantly newer (2023 vs 2013). The GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro K6000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro K6000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightQuadro K6000GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%)
Leading raw performance (+2.1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) (5nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
🎮 High Capacity (6 GB)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
Standard Size (265mm)

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K6000 and GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)

NVIDIA

Quadro K6000

The Quadro K6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 797 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,993 points. Launch price was $5,265.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)

The GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1545 MHz to 1890 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,160 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K6000 scores 7,993 and the GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) reaches 8,160 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K6000 is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,880 (Quadro K6000) vs 3,072 (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)). Raw compute: 5.196 TFLOPS (Quadro K6000) vs 11.61 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)). Boost clocks: 902 MHz vs 1890 MHz.

FeatureQuadro K6000GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)
G3D Mark Score
7,993
8,160+2%
Architecture
Kepler
Ada Lovelace
Process Node
28 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
2880
3072+7%
Compute (TFLOPS)
5.196 TFLOPS
11.61 TFLOPS+123%
Boost Clock
902 MHz
1890 MHz+110%
ROPs
48
48
TMUs
240+150%
96
L1 Cache
0.23 MB
3 MB+1204%
L2 Cache
1.5 MB
32 MB+2033%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro K6000GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K6000 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) has 6 GB. The Quadro K6000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 211 GB/s (Quadro K6000) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)) — a 9.9% advantage for the Quadro K6000. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Quadro K6000) vs 32 MB (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)) — the GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro K6000GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)
VRAM Capacity
12 GB+100%
6 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
211 GB/s+10%
192 GB/s
Bus Width
256-bit+33%
192-bit
L2 Cache
1.5 MB
32 MB+2033%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (Quadro K6000) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureQuadro K6000GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)
DirectX
11.0
12+9%
Vulkan
1.1
1.3+18%
OpenGL
4.5
4.6+2%
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1.0 (Quadro K6000) vs NVENC 6th Gen (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs NVDEC 3rd Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (Quadro K6000) vs H.264,H.265 (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)).

FeatureQuadro K6000GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Encoder
NVENC 1.0
NVENC 6th Gen
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP5
NVDEC 3rd Gen
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264
H.264,H.265
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K6000 draws 225W versus the GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)'s 115W — a 64.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K6000) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 265mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70.

FeatureQuadro K6000GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)
TDP
225W
115W-49%
Recommended PSU
350W-30%
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
265mm
0mm
Height
110mm
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
80°C
70-13%
Perf/Watt
35.5
71.0+100%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2013).

FeatureQuadro K6000GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)
MSRP
$5265
Avg Price (30d)
$300
Codename
GK110B
AD107
Release
July 23 2013
January 3 2023
Ranking
#318
#102