Quadro K6000
VS
Radeon RX 7600

Quadro K6000 vs Radeon RX 7600

NVIDIA

Quadro K6000

2013Core: 797 MHzBoost: 902 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 7600

2023Core: 1720 MHzBoost: 2655 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro K6000 is positioned at rank #319 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro K6000

#303
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
9719%
#318
FirePro V8800
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $100
100%
#319
Quadro K6000
MSRP: $5265|Avg: $300
100%
#320
NVS 510
MSRP: $449|Avg: $15
99%
#321
GRID M60-1Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $50
97%
#322
GRID K280Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $50
93%
#323
FirePro M2000
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
93%
#324
Tesla K20c
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $500
91%
#325
GRID M6-1Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
91%
#326
Quadro FX 380
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
90%
#327
Tesla C2050 / C2070
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $30
90%
#328
FirePro M7740
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
88%
#329
Quadro FX 570
MSRP: $199|Avg: $15
86%
#330
RTXA5000-24Q
MSRP: $3721|Avg: $2100
85%
#331
GRID P40-1Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
84%
#333
Tesla M10
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7600

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
109%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
105%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
104%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
104%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
103%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
103%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
102%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
101%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
100%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
100%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
99%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
99%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
97%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
97%
#15
Radeon RX 6500 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $150
97%
#16
GeForce RTX 3070
MSRP: $499|Avg: $200
96%
#17
Radeon RX 6700
MSRP: $379|Avg: $300
95%
#18
Radeon RX 6600 XT
MSRP: $379|Avg: $170
94%
#19
Radeon RX590 GME
MSRP: $173|Avg: $115
93%
#20
Radeon RX 6650 XT
MSRP: $399|Avg: $230
93%
#21
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti
MSRP: $379|Avg: $379
91%
#22
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
MSRP: $169|Avg: $179
91%
#23
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
MSRP: $249|Avg: $209
90%
#24
Radeon RX 6600 LE
MSRP: $329|Avg: $160
90%
#25
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB
MSRP: $379|Avg: $379
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon RX 7600 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2013). The Radeon RX 7600 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro K6000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon RX 7600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 107.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro K6000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightQuadro K6000Radeon RX 7600
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-107.4%)
Leading raw performance (+107.4%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+50%)
🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
Standard Size (265mm)
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon RX 7600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $250 versus $300 for the Quadro K6000, it costs 17% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 148.9% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightQuadro K6000Radeon RX 7600
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+148.9%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300)
More affordable ($250)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K6000 and Radeon RX 7600

NVIDIA

Quadro K6000

The Quadro K6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 797 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,993 points. Launch price was $5,265.

AMD

Radeon RX 7600

The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro K6000 scores 7,993 versus the Radeon RX 7600's 16,581 — the Radeon RX 7600 leads by 107.4%. The Quadro K6000 is built on Kepler while the Radeon RX 7600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,880 (Quadro K6000) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600). Raw compute: 5.196 TFLOPS (Quadro K6000) vs 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600). Boost clocks: 902 MHz vs 2655 MHz.

FeatureQuadro K6000Radeon RX 7600
G3D Mark Score
7,993
16,581+107%
Architecture
Kepler
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
28 nm
6 nm
Shading Units
2880+41%
2048
Compute (TFLOPS)
5.196 TFLOPS
21.75 TFLOPS+319%
Boost Clock
902 MHz
2655 MHz+194%
ROPs
48
64+33%
TMUs
240+88%
128
L1 Cache
240 KB
512 KB+113%
L2 Cache
1.5 MB
2 MB+33%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro K6000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

FeatureQuadro K6000Radeon RX 7600
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 3 (Native)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K6000 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7600 has 8 GB. The Quadro K6000 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 211 GB/s (Quadro K6000) vs 288 GB/s (Radeon RX 7600) — a 36.5% advantage for the Radeon RX 7600. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Quadro K6000) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600) — the Radeon RX 7600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro K6000Radeon RX 7600
VRAM Capacity
12 GB+50%
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
211 GB/s
288 GB/s+36%
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
1.5 MB
2 MB+33%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (Quadro K6000) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7600). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureQuadro K6000Radeon RX 7600
DirectX
11.0
12.2+11%
Vulkan
1.1
1.3+18%
OpenGL
4.5
4.6+2%
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1.0 (Quadro K6000) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (Quadro K6000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7600).

FeatureQuadro K6000Radeon RX 7600
Encoder
NVENC 1.0
VCN 4.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP5
VCN 4.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K6000 draws 225W versus the Radeon RX 7600's 165W — a 30.8% difference. The Radeon RX 7600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K6000) vs 550W (Radeon RX 7600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 265mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.

FeatureQuadro K6000Radeon RX 7600
TDP
225W
165W-27%
Recommended PSU
350W-36%
550W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
8-pin
Length
265mm
240mm
Height
110mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
80°C
75°C-6%
Perf/Watt
35.5
100.5+183%
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro K6000 launched at $5265 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the Radeon RX 7600 launched at $269 and now averages $250. The Radeon RX 7600 costs 16.7% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 26.6 (Quadro K6000) vs 66.3 (Radeon RX 7600) — the Radeon RX 7600 offers 149.2% better value. The Radeon RX 7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2013).

FeatureQuadro K6000Radeon RX 7600
MSRP
$5265
$269-95%
Avg Price (30d)
$300
$250-17%
Performance per Dollar
26.6
66.3+149%
Codename
GK110B
Navi 33
Release
July 23 2013
May 24 2023
Ranking
#318
#118