Quadro P4000 Max-Q vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro P4000 Max-Q is positioned at rank #11 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Excellent cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro P4000 Max-Q

#1

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

197%

#11

Quadro P4000 Max-Q

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#26

RTX A400

MSRP: $135|Avg: $135

59%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

#20

Radeon RX 6650 XT

MSRP: $399|Avg: $230

110%

#21

GeForce RTX 5060 Ti

MSRP: $379|Avg: $379

109%

#22

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

MSRP: $169|Avg: $179

108%

#23

GeForce RTX 3050 8GB

MSRP: $249|Avg: $209

108%

#24

Radeon RX 6600 LE

MSRP: $329|Avg: $160

107%

#25

GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB

MSRP: $379|Avg: $379

107%

#26

Radeon RX 7700 XT

MSRP: $449|Avg: $380

107%

#27

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $380

107%

#28

Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB

MSRP: $269|Avg: $318

106%

#29

Radeon RX 6700 XT

MSRP: $479|Avg: $230

106%

#30

GeForce RTX 3060

MSRP: $329|Avg: $289

106%

#31

Radeon RX 7400

MSRP: $199|Avg: $199

105%

#32

Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB

MSRP: $349|Avg: $349

105%

#33

Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB

MSRP: $349|Avg: $349

103%

#34

Radeon RX 5300

MSRP: $129|Avg: $50

101%

#35

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

MSRP: $150|Avg: $77

100%

#36

Radeon RX 6400

MSRP: $159|Avg: $139

100%

#37

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

MSRP: $599|Avg: $330

100%

#38

Arc A750

MSRP: $289|Avg: $229

99%

#39

Radeon RX 6800

MSRP: $579|Avg: $370

98%

#40

GeForce RTX 3060 8GB

MSRP: $329|Avg: $280

98%

#41

Radeon RX 6750 XT

MSRP: $549|Avg: $320

97%

#42

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

MSRP: $799|Avg: $590

96%

#43

GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB

MSRP: $429|Avg: $429

95%

#44

GeForce RTX 5070

MSRP: $549|Avg: $550

94%

#45

Radeon RX 7600 XT

MSRP: $329|Avg: $330

94%

#46

GeForce RTX 2050

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

92%

#47

GeForce RTX 3080

MSRP: $699|Avg: $400

92%

#48

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB

MSRP: $499|Avg: $449

91%

#49

Radeon RX 7900 GRE

MSRP: $549|Avg: $540

90%

#50

GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

MSRP: $599|Avg: $600

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P4000 Max-Q.

Insight	Quadro P4000 Max-Q	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro P4000 Max-Q Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P4000 Max-Q and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

Quadro P4000 Max-Q

The Quadro P4000 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1114 MHz to 1228 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,500 points.

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 9 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 928 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,525 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P4000 Max-Q scores 7,500 and the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti reaches 7,525 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P4000 Max-Q is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti uses Kepler, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Quadro P4000 Max-Q) vs 768 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti). Raw compute: 4.401 TFLOPS (Quadro P4000 Max-Q) vs 1.425 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti).

Feature	Quadro P4000 Max-Q	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
G3D Mark Score	7,500	7,525
Architecture	Pascal	Kepler
Process Node	16 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1792+133%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.401 TFLOPS+209%	1.425 TFLOPS
ROPs	64+300%	16
TMUs	112+75%	64
L1 Cache	672 KB+950%	64 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro P4000 Max-Q	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro P4000 Max-Q) vs 0.25 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) — the Quadro P4000 Max-Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro P4000 Max-Q	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P4000 Max-Q) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	Quadro P4000 Max-Q	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
DirectX	12.1	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (Quadro P4000 Max-Q) vs NVENC 6 (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs NVDEC 4. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P4000 Max-Q) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti).

Feature	Quadro P4000 Max-Q	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Encoder	NVENC 6.0	NVENC 6 (Volta)
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP8	NVDEC 4
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P4000 Max-Q draws 100W versus the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P4000 Max-Q) vs 0W (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.