
Quadro P500 vs GeForce RTX 2060

Quadro P500
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro P500 is positioned at rank #244 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P500
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 2060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 750.8% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (6 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P500.
| Insight | Quadro P500 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-750.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+750.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 2060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $120 versus $500 for the Quadro P500, it costs 76% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 3444.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro P500 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+3444.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($120) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P500 and GeForce RTX 2060

Quadro P500
The Quadro P500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 5 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1455 MHz to 1518 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 18W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,659 points.

GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro P500 scores 1,659 versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 14,114 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 750.8%. The Quadro P500 is built on Pascal while the GeForce RTX 2060 uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 256 (Quadro P500) vs 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060). Raw compute: 0.7772 TFLOPS (Quadro P500) vs 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060). Boost clocks: 1518 MHz vs 1680 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P500 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,659 | 14,114+751% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 1920+650% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7772 TFLOPS | 6.451 TFLOPS+730% |
| Boost Clock | 1518 MHz | 1680 MHz+11% |
| ROPs | 16 | 48+200% |
| TMUs | 16 | 120+650% |
| L1 Cache | 0.09 MB | 1.9 MB+2011% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 3 MB+500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P500 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P500 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Quadro P500) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P500 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 3 MB+500% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P500 draws 18W versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 160W — a 159.6% difference. The Quadro P500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P500) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin.
| Feature | Quadro P500 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 18W-89% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 229mm |
| Height | — | 113mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 72 |
| Perf/Watt | 92.2+5% | 88.2 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P500 launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 and now averages $120. The GeForce RTX 2060 costs 76% less ($380 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.3 (Quadro P500) vs 117.6 (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 3463.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2018).
| Feature | Quadro P500 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $349-30% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $120-76% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.3 | 117.6+3464% |
| Codename | GP108 | TU106 |
| Release | January 5 2018 | January 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #740 | #168 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















