Quadro P500 vs Intel UHD Graphics 750
Quadro P500
Popular choices:
Intel UHD Graphics 750
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro P500 is positioned at rank #244 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P500
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Intel UHD Graphics 750 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro P500 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro P500 | Intel UHD Graphics 750 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Intel UHD Graphics 750 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P500 and Intel UHD Graphics 750
Quadro P500
The Quadro P500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 5 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1455 MHz to 1518 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 18W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,659 points.
Intel UHD Graphics 750
The Intel UHD Graphics 750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in March 30 2021. It features the Generation 12.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1300 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,702 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P500 scores 1,659 and the Intel UHD Graphics 750 reaches 1,702 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P500 is built on Pascal while the Intel UHD Graphics 750 uses Generation 12.1, both on 14 nm vs 14 nm+++. Shader units: 256 (Quadro P500) vs 256 (Intel UHD Graphics 750). Raw compute: 0.7772 TFLOPS (Quadro P500) vs 0.6656 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 750). Boost clocks: 1518 MHz vs 1300 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P500 | Intel UHD Graphics 750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,659 | 1,702+3% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Generation 12.1 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm+++ |
| Shading Units | 256 | 256 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7772 TFLOPS+17% | 0.6656 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1518 MHz+17% | 1300 MHz |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P500 | Intel UHD Graphics 750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P500 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics 750 has 0 MB. The Quadro P500 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | Quadro P500 | Intel UHD Graphics 750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P500 draws 18W versus the Intel UHD Graphics 750's 15W — a 18.2% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P500) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | Quadro P500 | Intel UHD Graphics 750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 18W | 15W-17% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Perf/Watt | 92.2 | 113.5+23% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P500 launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the Intel UHD Graphics 750 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Intel UHD Graphics 750 costs 100+% less ($500 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.3 (Quadro P500) vs Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 750) — the Intel UHD Graphics 750 offers Infinity% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics 750 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2018).
| Feature | Quadro P500 | Intel UHD Graphics 750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.3 | Infinity |
| Codename | GP108 | Rocket Lake GT1 |
| Release | January 5 2018 | March 30 2021 |
| Ranking | #740 | #722 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P500 and Intel UHD Graphics 750
