Quadro P500
VS
GRID M10-2B

Quadro P500 vs GRID M10-2B

NVIDIA

Quadro P500

2018Core: 1455 MHzBoost: 1518 MHz
VS

GRID M10-2B

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro P500 is positioned at rank 244 and the GRID M10-2B is on rank 372, so the Quadro P500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro P500

#102
Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
MSRP: $4399|Avg: $3500
96%
#103
Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $4999
89%
#104
Radeon Pro W6900X
MSRP: $6000|Avg: $5000
87%
#105
Quadro RTX 6000
MSRP: $6300|Avg: $1800
86%
#106
L40S
MSRP: $7500|Avg: $7500
80%
#229
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
4450%
#244
Quadro P500
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
100%
#246
FireStream 9370
MSRP: $800|Avg: $50
95%
#247
GRID K260Q
MSRP: $937|Avg: $15
95%
#249
Quadro 600
MSRP: $179|Avg: $20
88%
#251
Quadro 410
MSRP: $149|Avg: $25
86%
#253
FirePro W600
MSRP: $599|Avg: $30
85%
#254
Quadro K5200
MSRP: $2250|Avg: $70
82%
#255
L2
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $1500
82%
#256
FirePro W8100
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $200
82%
#257
FirePro V7800
MSRP: $759|Avg: $96
80%
#258
Quadro K2000D
MSRP: $599|Avg: $35
80%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GRID M10-2B

#357
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
22383%
#372
GRID M10-2B
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $80
100%
#373
Quadro FX 370
MSRP: $129|Avg: $500
98%
#374
Quadro 6000
MSRP: $4399|Avg: $150
92%
#375
RTXA5000-6Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2500
92%
#376
GRID M6-0B
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
92%
#377
GRID M10-1B
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $150
91%
#378
Tesla K40c
MSRP: $7699|Avg: $500
88%
#379
Quadro FX 4800
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $80
85%
#380
Tesla M2090
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $40
85%
#381
GRID K2
MSRP: $5199|Avg: $80
80%
#382
GRID K180Q
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $1000
80%
#383
Quadro CX
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $500
71%
#384
GRID P100-8Q
MSRP: $7374|Avg: $550
67%
#385
Quadro FX 350
MSRP: $199|Avg: $15
65%
#386
Quadro FX 550
MSRP: $150|Avg: $10
65%
#387
Tesla M2070
MSRP: $3099|Avg: $50
64%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Quadro P500 uses modern memory architecture. The Quadro P500 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID M10-2B lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro P500 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID M10-2B.

InsightQuadro P500GRID M10-2B
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.9%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+700%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The GRID M10-2B offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $80 versus $500 for the Quadro P500, it costs 84% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 519.3% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightQuadro P500GRID M10-2B
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+519.3%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500)
More affordable ($80)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P500 and GRID M10-2B

NVIDIA

Quadro P500

The Quadro P500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 5 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1455 MHz to 1518 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 18W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,659 points.

NVIDIA

GRID M10-2B

The GRID M10-2B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,644 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P500 scores 1,659 and the GRID M10-2B reaches 1,644 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P500 is built on Pascal while the GRID M10-2B uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 256 (Quadro P500) vs 2,048 (GRID M10-2B). Raw compute: 0.7772 TFLOPS (Quadro P500) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-2B). Boost clocks: 1518 MHz vs 1178 MHz.

FeatureQuadro P500GRID M10-2B
G3D Mark Score
1,659
1,644
Architecture
Pascal
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
256
2048+700%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7772 TFLOPS
4.825 TFLOPS+521%
Boost Clock
1518 MHz+29%
1178 MHz
ROPs
16
64+300%
TMUs
16
128+700%
L1 Cache
96 KB
768 KB+700%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro P500GRID M10-2B
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P500 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GRID M10-2B has 512 MB. The Quadro P500 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Quadro P500) vs 2 MB (GRID M10-2B) — the GRID M10-2B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro P500GRID M10-2B
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+700%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P500 draws 18W versus the GRID M10-2B's 225W — a 170.4% difference. The Quadro P500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P500) vs 350W (GRID M10-2B). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureQuadro P500GRID M10-2B
TDP
18W-92%
225W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
92.2+1163%
7.3
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro P500 launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the GRID M10-2B launched at $2500 and now averages $80. The GRID M10-2B costs 84% less ($420 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.3 (Quadro P500) vs 20.6 (GRID M10-2B) — the GRID M10-2B offers 524.2% better value. The Quadro P500 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2015).

FeatureQuadro P500GRID M10-2B
MSRP
$500-80%
$2500
Avg Price (30d)
$500
$80-84%
Performance per Dollar
3.3
20.6+524%
Codename
GP108
GM204
Release
January 5 2018
August 30 2015
Ranking
#740
#433