CPU
GPU
Quadro P5000 (móvel)
Popular choices:
CMP 40HX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro P5000 (móvel) is positioned at rank 242 and the CMP 40HX is on rank 119, so the CMP 40HX offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P5000 (móvel)
Performance Per Dollar CMP 40HX
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The CMP 40HX uses modern memory architecture. The CMP 40HX likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P5000 (móvel) lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P5000 (móvel) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the CMP 40HX.
| Insight | Quadro P5000 (móvel) | CMP 40HX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The CMP 40HX offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $120 versus $400 for the Quadro P5000 (móvel), it costs 70% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 224% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro P5000 (móvel) | CMP 40HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+224%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($400) | ✅More affordable ($120) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P5000 (móvel) and CMP 40HX
Quadro P5000 (móvel)
The Quadro P5000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1278 MHz to 1582 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,000 points. Launch price was $1,885.
CMP 40HX
The CMP 40HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1470 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,749 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P5000 (móvel) scores 9,000 and the CMP 40HX reaches 8,749 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P5000 (móvel) is built on Pascal while the CMP 40HX uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Quadro P5000 (móvel)) vs 2,304 (CMP 40HX). Raw compute: 6.48 TFLOPS (Quadro P5000 (móvel)) vs 7.603 TFLOPS (CMP 40HX). Boost clocks: 1582 MHz vs 1650 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 (móvel) | CMP 40HX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,000+3% | 8,749 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2304+13% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.48 TFLOPS | 7.603 TFLOPS+17% |
| Boost Clock | 1582 MHz | 1650 MHz+4% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 128 | 144+13% |
| L1 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2.3 MB+207% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P5000 (móvel) | CMP 40HX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro P5000 (móvel)) vs 4 MB (CMP 40HX) — the CMP 40HX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 (móvel) | CMP 40HX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P5000 (móvel)) vs 12 Ultimate (CMP 40HX). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 (móvel) | CMP 40HX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.2+20% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P5000 (móvel)) vs No (CMP 40HX). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs No.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 (móvel) | CMP 40HX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | No |
| Decoder | 3rd Gen NVDEC | No |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P5000 (móvel) draws 100W versus the CMP 40HX's 185W — a 59.6% difference. The Quadro P5000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P5000 (móvel)) vs 500W (CMP 40HX). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 (móvel) | CMP 40HX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-46% | 185W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 229mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 90.0+90% | 47.3 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P5000 (móvel) launched at $2499 MSRP and currently averages $400, while the CMP 40HX launched at $699 and now averages $120. The CMP 40HX costs 70% less ($280 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 22.5 (Quadro P5000 (móvel)) vs 72.9 (CMP 40HX) — the CMP 40HX offers 224% better value. The CMP 40HX is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2017).
| Feature | Quadro P5000 (móvel) | CMP 40HX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499 | $699-72% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $400 | $120-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.5 | 72.9+224% |
| Codename | GP104 | TU106 |
| Release | January 11 2017 | February 25 2021 |
| Ranking | #235 | #302 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P5000 (móvel) and CMP 40HX
