Quadro P5000 (móvel)
Radeon R9 295X2
Quadro P5000 (móvel) vs Radeon R9 295X2 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro P5000 (móvel) vs Radeon R9 295X2 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro P5000 (móvel) vs Radeon R9 295X2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro P5000 (móvel)
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 500W, a 400W reduction.
- ✅Measures 267mm instead of 307mm, a 40mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 16nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 295X2 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌66.7% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$1,499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.6 vs 5.8 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
Radeon R9 295X2
2014Why buy it
- ✅13.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,000 less on MSRP ($1,499 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 61.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.8 vs 3.6 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌400% higher power demand at 500W vs 100W.
- ❌15% longer card at 307mm vs 267mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro P5000 (móvel) vs Radeon R9 295X2 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Quadro P5000 (móvel)
The Quadro P5000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1278 MHz to 1582 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,000 points. Launch price was $1,885.
Radeon R9 295X2
The Radeon R9 295X2 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 29 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1018 MHz. It has 2816 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 500W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,734 points. Launch price was $1,499.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P5000 (móvel) scores 9,000 and the Radeon R9 295X2 reaches 8,734 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P5000 (móvel) is built on Pascal while the Radeon R9 295X2 uses GCN 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Quadro P5000 (móvel)) vs 2,816 (Radeon R9 295X2). Raw compute: 6.48 TFLOPS (Quadro P5000 (móvel)) vs 5.733 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon R9 295X2). Boost clocks: 1582 MHz vs 1018 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 (móvel) | Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,000+3% | 8,734 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2816 ×2+38% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.48 TFLOPS+13% | 5.733 TFLOPS ×2 |
| Boost Clock | 1582 MHz+55% | 1018 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 ×2 |
| TMUs | 128 | 176 ×2+38% |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+9% | 704 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P5000 (móvel) | Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P5000 (móvel) has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 295X2 carries 8 GB. Radeon R9 295X2 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro P5000 (móvel) and 512-bit x2 on the Radeon R9 295X2. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro P5000 (móvel)) vs 1 MB (Radeon R9 295X2) — the Quadro P5000 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 (móvel) | Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 512-bit x2+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P5000 (móvel)) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 295X2). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 (móvel) | Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.1+10% |
| OpenGL | 4.6+7% | 4.3 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P5000 (móvel)) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 295X2). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P5000 (móvel)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 295X2).
| Feature | Quadro P5000 (móvel) | Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | 3rd Gen NVDEC | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P5000 (móvel) draws 100W versus the Radeon R9 295X2's 500W — a 133.3% difference. The Quadro P5000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P5000 (móvel)) vs 1000W (Radeon R9 295X2). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 307mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 (móvel) | Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-80% | 500W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-50% | 1000W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 307mm |
| Height | 111mm | 114mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 65°C-19% |
| Perf/Watt | 90.0+414% | 17.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro P5000 (móvel) came in at $2499, while the Radeon R9 295X2 launched at $1499. On MSRP, Radeon R9 295X2 was 40% cheaper ($1000 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.6 (Quadro P5000 (móvel)) vs 5.8 (Radeon R9 295X2) — the Radeon R9 295X2 offers 61.1% better value. The newer card here is Quadro P5000 (móvel) (2017 vs 2014).
| Feature | Quadro P5000 (móvel) | Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499 | $1499-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.6 | 5.8+61% |
| Codename | GP104 | Vesuvius |
| Release | January 11 2017 | April 29 2014 |
| Ranking | #235 | #303 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P5000 (móvel) and Radeon R9 295X2
