
Quadro P5000 (móvel) vs Radeon R9 295X2

Quadro P5000 (móvel)
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 295X2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro P5000 (móvel) is positioned at rank #242 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P5000 (móvel)
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P5000 (móvel) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R9 295X2 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro P5000 (móvel) | Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (307mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R9 295X2 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 295X2 holds the technical lead. Priced at $200 (vs $400), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 94.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro P5000 (móvel) | Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+94.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($400) | ✅More affordable ($200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P5000 (móvel) and Radeon R9 295X2

Quadro P5000 (móvel)
The Quadro P5000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1278 MHz to 1582 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,000 points. Launch price was $1,885.

Radeon R9 295X2
The Radeon R9 295X2 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 29 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1018 MHz. It has 2816 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 500W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,734 points. Launch price was $1,499.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P5000 (móvel) scores 9,000 and the Radeon R9 295X2 reaches 8,734 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P5000 (móvel) is built on Pascal while the Radeon R9 295X2 uses GCN 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Quadro P5000 (móvel)) vs 2,816 (Radeon R9 295X2). Raw compute: 6.48 TFLOPS (Quadro P5000 (móvel)) vs 5.733 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon R9 295X2). Boost clocks: 1582 MHz vs 1018 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 (móvel) | Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,000+3% | 8,734 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2816 ×2+38% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.48 TFLOPS+13% | 5.733 TFLOPS ×2 |
| Boost Clock | 1582 MHz+55% | 1018 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 ×2 |
| TMUs | 128 | 176 ×2+38% |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+9% | 704 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P5000 (móvel) | Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P5000 (móvel) comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 295X2 has 8 GB. The Radeon R9 295X2 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 512-bit x2. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro P5000 (móvel)) vs 1 MB (Radeon R9 295X2) — the Quadro P5000 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 (móvel) | Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 512-bit x2+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P5000 (móvel)) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 295X2). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 (móvel) | Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.1+10% |
| OpenGL | 4.6+7% | 4.3 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P5000 (móvel)) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 295X2). Decoder: 3rd Gen NVDEC vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P5000 (móvel)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 295X2).
| Feature | Quadro P5000 (móvel) | Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | 3rd Gen NVDEC | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P5000 (móvel) draws 100W versus the Radeon R9 295X2's 500W — a 133.3% difference. The Quadro P5000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P5000 (móvel)) vs 1000W (Radeon R9 295X2). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 307mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | Quadro P5000 (móvel) | Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-80% | 500W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-50% | 1000W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 307mm |
| Height | 111mm | 114mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 65°C-19% |
| Perf/Watt | 90.0+414% | 17.5 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P5000 (móvel) launched at $2499 MSRP and currently averages $400, while the Radeon R9 295X2 launched at $1499 and now averages $200. The Radeon R9 295X2 costs 50% less ($200 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 22.5 (Quadro P5000 (móvel)) vs 43.7 (Radeon R9 295X2) — the Radeon R9 295X2 offers 94.2% better value. The Quadro P5000 (móvel) is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2014).
| Feature | Quadro P5000 (móvel) | Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499 | $1499-40% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $400 | $200-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.5 | 43.7+94% |
| Codename | GP104 | Vesuvius |
| Release | January 11 2017 | April 29 2014 |
| Ranking | #235 | #303 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















