
GeForce GTX TITAN Black vs Quadro P5000 (móvel)

GeForce GTX TITAN Black
Popular choices:

Quadro P5000 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P5000 (móvel)
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (6 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P5000 (móvel).
| Insight | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Quadro P5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX TITAN Black holds the technical lead. Priced at $120 (vs $400), it costs 70% less, resulting in a 239.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Quadro P5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+239.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($120) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($400) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX TITAN Black and Quadro P5000 (móvel)

GeForce GTX TITAN Black
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 889 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,177 points. Launch price was $999.

Quadro P5000 (móvel)
The Quadro P5000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1278 MHz to 1582 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,000 points. Launch price was $1,885.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black scores 9,177 and the Quadro P5000 (móvel) reaches 9,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX TITAN Black is built on Kepler while the Quadro P5000 (móvel) uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,880 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 2,048 (Quadro P5000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 5.645 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 6.48 TFLOPS (Quadro P5000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 980 MHz vs 1582 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Quadro P5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,177+2% | 9,000 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2880+41% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.645 TFLOPS | 6.48 TFLOPS+15% |
| Boost Clock | 980 MHz | 1582 MHz+61% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 240+88% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 240 KB | 768 KB+220% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Quadro P5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P5000 (móvel) has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX TITAN Black offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 2 MB (Quadro P5000 (móvel)) — the Quadro P5000 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Quadro P5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 12.1 (Quadro P5000 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Quadro P5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2+20% | 1.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1.0 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P5000 (móvel)). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P5000 (móvel)).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Quadro P5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1.0 | 6th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | 3rd Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black draws 250W versus the Quadro P5000 (móvel)'s 100W — a 85.7% difference. The Quadro P5000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 500W (Quadro P5000 (móvel)). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Quadro P5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 100W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 36.7 | 90.0+145% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black launched at $999 MSRP and currently averages $120, while the Quadro P5000 (móvel) launched at $2499 and now averages $400. The GeForce GTX TITAN Black costs 70% less ($280 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 76.5 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 22.5 (Quadro P5000 (móvel)) — the GeForce GTX TITAN Black offers 240% better value. The Quadro P5000 (móvel) is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Quadro P5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999-60% | $2499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $120-70% | $400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 76.5+240% | 22.5 |
| Codename | GK110B | GP104 |
| Release | February 18 2014 | January 11 2017 |
| Ranking | #288 | #235 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















