G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX TITAN Black vs Quadro P2200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX TITAN Black vs Quadro P2200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX TITAN Black

2014

Why buy it

✅31.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅20% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 5 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
132.9% HIGHER MSRP
$999 MSRPvs$429 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.2 vs 21.9 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
❌233.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 75W.
❌32.8% longer card at 267mm vs 201mm.

Quadro P2200

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $570 less on MSRP ($429 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 138.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.9 vs 9.2 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅GeForce GTX TITAN Black is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Quadro P2200 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 75W instead of 250W, a 175W reduction.
✅Measures 201mm instead of 267mm, a 66mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX TITAN Black across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 5 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, 5 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX TITAN Black is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 31.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro P2200 instead at 9,386 vs 9,177, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro P2200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 16nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro P2200 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $570 cheaper on MSRP at $429 vs $999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 138.2% (21.9 vs 9.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GeForce GTX TITAN Black still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX TITAN Black vs Quadro P2200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX TITAN Black

The GeForce GTX TITAN Black is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 889 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,177 points. Launch price was $999.

Quadro P2200

The Quadro P2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 10 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1493 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,386 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX TITAN Black scores 9,177 and the Quadro P2200 reaches 9,386 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX TITAN Black is built on Kepler while the Quadro P2200 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,880 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 1,280 (Quadro P2200). Raw compute: 5.645 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 3.822 TFLOPS (Quadro P2200). Boost clocks: 980 MHz vs 1493 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN Black	Quadro P2200
G3D Mark Score	9,177	9,386+2%
Architecture	Kepler	Pascal
Process Node	28 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	2880+125%	1280
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.645 TFLOPS+48%	3.822 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	980 MHz	1493 MHz+52%
ROPs	48+20%	40
TMUs	240+200%	80
L1 Cache	240 KB	480 KB+100%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+20%	1.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX TITAN Black gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro P2200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN Black	Quadro P2200
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX TITAN Black has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P2200 carries 5 GB. GeForce GTX TITAN Black gives you 20% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the GeForce GTX TITAN Black and 256-bit on the Quadro P2200. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 1.25 MB (Quadro P2200) — the GeForce GTX TITAN Black has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN Black	Quadro P2200
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+20%	5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	384-bit+50%	256-bit
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+20%	1.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.0 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 12.1 (Quadro P2200). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN Black	Quadro P2200
DirectX	12.0	12.1
Vulkan	1.2	1.4+17%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1.0 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P2200). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P2200).

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN Black	Quadro P2200
Encoder	NVENC 1.0	6th Gen NVENC
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP5	3rd Gen NVDEC
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX TITAN Black draws 250W versus the Quadro P2200's 75W — a 107.7% difference. The Quadro P2200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 500W (Quadro P2200). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 201mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN Black	Quadro P2200
TDP	250W	75W-70%
Recommended PSU	600W	500W-17%
Power Connector	6-pin + 8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	201mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	80°C	75°C-6%
Perf/Watt	36.7	125.1+241%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX TITAN Black came in at $999, while the Quadro P2200 launched at $429. On MSRP, Quadro P2200 was 57.1% cheaper ($570 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 21.9 (Quadro P2200) — the Quadro P2200 offers 138% better value. The newer card here is Quadro P2200 (2019 vs 2014).

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN Black	Quadro P2200
MSRP	$999	$429-57%
Performance per Dollar	9.2	21.9+138%
Codename	GK110B	GP106
Release	February 18 2014	June 10 2019
Ranking	#288	#281

Search GeForce GTX TITAN Black on Amazon

Search Quadro P2200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.