Arc A550M
GeForce GTX TITAN Black
Arc A550M vs GeForce GTX TITAN Black Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Arc A550M vs GeForce GTX TITAN Black FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Arc A550M vs GeForce GTX TITAN Black: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Arc A550M
2022Why buy it
- ✅8.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 60W instead of 250W, a 190W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
GeForce GTX TITAN Black
2014Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Arc A550M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2014 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌316.7% higher power demand at 250W vs 60W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc A550M vs GeForce GTX TITAN Black Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Arc A550M
The Arc A550M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,000 points.
GeForce GTX TITAN Black
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 889 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,177 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A550M scores 9,000 and the GeForce GTX TITAN Black reaches 9,177 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A550M is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce GTX TITAN Black uses Kepler, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Arc A550M) vs 2,880 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black). Raw compute: 8.397 TFLOPS (Arc A550M) vs 5.645 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX TITAN Black). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 980 MHz.
| Feature | Arc A550M | GeForce GTX TITAN Black |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,000 | 9,177+2% |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2880+41% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.397 TFLOPS+49% | 5.645 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2050 MHz+109% | 980 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 128 | 240+88% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+1204% | 0.23 MB |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+433% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Arc A550M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Arc A550M | GeForce GTX TITAN Black |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc A550M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX TITAN Black carries 6 GB. GeForce GTX TITAN Black gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (Arc A550M) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce GTX TITAN Black. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Arc A550M and 384-bit on the GeForce GTX TITAN Black. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Arc A550M) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) — the Arc A550M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A550M | GeForce GTX TITAN Black |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 336 GB/s+50% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+433% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A550M) vs 12.0 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A550M | GeForce GTX TITAN Black |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Xe) (Arc A550M) vs NVENC 1.0 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black). Decoder: QuickSync (Xe) vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Arc A550M) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black).
| Feature | Arc A550M | GeForce GTX TITAN Black |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync (Xe) | NVENC 1.0 |
| Decoder | QuickSync (Xe) | PureVideo HD VP5 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A550M draws 60W versus the GeForce GTX TITAN Black's 250W — a 122.6% difference. The Arc A550M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Arc A550M) vs 600W (GeForce GTX TITAN Black). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 80°C.
| Feature | Arc A550M | GeForce GTX TITAN Black |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 60W-76% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-17% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 150.0+309% | 36.7 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Arc A550M (2022 vs 2014).
| Feature | Arc A550M | GeForce GTX TITAN Black |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $999 |
| Codename | DG2-512 | GK110B |
| Release | 2022 | February 18 2014 |
| Ranking | #279 | #288 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc A550M and GeForce GTX TITAN Black
