Arc A550M vs Radeon R9 Fury X

Intel

Arc A550M

2022Core: 900 MHzBoost: 2050 MHz
Similar parts
····
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 Fury X

2015Boost: 1050 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Arc A550M vs Radeon R9 Fury X Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Arc A550M vs Radeon R9 Fury X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Arc A550M vs Radeon R9 Fury X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Arc A550M

2022

Why buy it

  • 7.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 60W instead of 275W, a 215W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 14.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $649 MSRP).

Radeon R9 Fury X

2015

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Arc A550M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 358.3% higher power demand at 275W vs 60W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Arc A550M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 7.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R9 Fury X instead at 9,382 vs 9,000, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Arc A550M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 6nm process instead of 28nm, 16 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2015. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 Fury X makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 Fury X is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Arc A550M has the stronger long-term case.

Arc A550M vs Radeon R9 Fury X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Arc A550M

The Arc A550M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,000 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 Fury X

The Radeon R9 Fury X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 24 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,382 points. Launch price was $649.

Graphics Performance

The Arc A550M scores 9,000 and the Radeon R9 Fury X reaches 9,382 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A550M is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon R9 Fury X uses GCN 3.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Arc A550M) vs 4,096 (Radeon R9 Fury X). Raw compute: 8.397 TFLOPS (Arc A550M) vs 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Fury X). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1050 MHz.

FeatureArc A550MRadeon R9 Fury X
G3D Mark Score
9,000
9,382+4%
Architecture
Generation 12.7
GCN 3.0
Process Node
6 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2048
4096+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.397 TFLOPS
8.602 TFLOPS+2%
Boost Clock
2050 MHz+95%
1050 MHz
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
128
256+100%
L1 Cache
3 MB+200%
1 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB+300%
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureArc A550MRadeon R9 Fury X
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (Arc A550M) vs 512 GB/s (Radeon R9 Fury X) — a 128.6% advantage for the Radeon R9 Fury X. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Arc A550M and 4096-bit on the Radeon R9 Fury X. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Arc A550M) vs 2 MB (Radeon R9 Fury X) — the Arc A550M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureArc A550MRadeon R9 Fury X
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
HBM
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
512 GB/s+129%
Bus Width
128-bit
4096-bit+3100%
L2 Cache
8 MB+300%
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A550M) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureArc A550MRadeon R9 Fury X
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12.0
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Xe) (Arc A550M) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury X). Decoder: QuickSync (Xe) vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Arc A550M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury X).

FeatureArc A550MRadeon R9 Fury X
Encoder
QuickSync (Xe)
VCE 3.0
Decoder
QuickSync (Xe)
UVD 6.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A550M draws 60W versus the Radeon R9 Fury X's 275W — a 128.4% difference. The Arc A550M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Arc A550M) vs 600W (Radeon R9 Fury X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 195mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 60°C.

FeatureArc A550MRadeon R9 Fury X
TDP
60W-78%
275W
Recommended PSU
500W-17%
600W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
2x 8-pin
Length
0mm
195mm
Height
0mm
115mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
85
60°C-29%
Perf/Watt
150.0+340%
34.1
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Arc A550M (2022 vs 2015).

FeatureArc A550MRadeon R9 Fury X
MSRP
$649
Codename
DG2-512
Fiji
Release
2022
June 24 2015
Ranking
#279
#282

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.