
Arc A550M

Radeon Pro W5500
Arc A550M vs Radeon Pro W5500 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Arc A550M vs Radeon Pro W5500 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Arc A550M vs Radeon Pro W5500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Arc A550M
2022Why buy it
- ✅27.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 60W instead of 125W, a 65W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 22.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Radeon Pro W5500
2020Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Arc A550M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Arc A550M is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌108.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 60W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Arc A550M vs Radeon Pro W5500 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Arc A550M
The Arc A550M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,000 points.

Radeon Pro W5500
The Radeon Pro W5500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1187 MHz to 1400 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,913 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A550M scores 9,000 and the Radeon Pro W5500 reaches 8,913 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A550M is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon Pro W5500 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 6 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Arc A550M) vs 1,408 (Radeon Pro W5500). Raw compute: 8.397 TFLOPS (Arc A550M) vs 3.942 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5500). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1400 MHz.
| Feature | Arc A550M | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,000 | 8,913 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+45% | 1408 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.397 TFLOPS+113% | 3.942 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2050 MHz+46% | 1400 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+45% | 88 |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+300% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Arc A550M | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc A550M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W5500 carries 8 GB. Radeon Pro W5500 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Arc A550M and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro W5500. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Arc A550M) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro W5500) — the Arc A550M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A550M | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+300% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A550M) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro W5500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A550M | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Xe) (Arc A550M) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5500). Decoder: QuickSync (Xe) vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Arc A550M) vs HEVC,H.264,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5500).
| Feature | Arc A550M | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync (Xe) | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | QuickSync (Xe) | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 | HEVC,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A550M draws 60W versus the Radeon Pro W5500's 125W — a 70.3% difference. The Arc A550M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Arc A550M) vs 500W (Radeon Pro W5500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 75°C.
| Feature | Arc A550M | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 60W-52% | 125W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 241mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 150.0+110% | 71.3 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Arc A550M (2022 vs 2020).
| Feature | Arc A550M | Radeon Pro W5500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $399 |
| Codename | DG2-512 | Navi 14 |
| Release | 2022 | February 10 2020 |
| Ranking | #279 | #294 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















