
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX TITAN Black
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 47.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.5 vs 9.2 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX TITAN Black across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
GeForce GTX TITAN Black
2014Why buy it
- ✅18.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌42.9% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$699 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.2 vs 13.5 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
2013GeForce GTX TITAN Black
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 47.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.5 vs 9.2 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅18.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX TITAN Black across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌42.9% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$699 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.2 vs 13.5 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX TITAN Black better than GeForce GTX 780 Ti?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 780 Ti make more sense than GeForce GTX TITAN Black?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | GeForce GTX TITAN Black |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 75 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 30 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 18 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | GeForce GTX TITAN Black |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 115 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 49 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 34 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 27 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | GeForce GTX TITAN Black |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 426 FPS | 413 FPS |
| medium | 341 FPS | 330 FPS |
| high | 284 FPS | 275 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 206 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 320 FPS | 310 FPS |
| medium | 256 FPS | 248 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 160 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 213 FPS | 206 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 103 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | GeForce GTX TITAN Black |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 105 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 37 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 47 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 780 Ti and GeForce GTX TITAN Black

GeForce GTX 780 Ti
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 7 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 875 MHz to 928 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,469 points. Launch price was $699.

GeForce GTX TITAN Black
GeForce GTX TITAN Black
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 889 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,177 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti scores 9,469 and the GeForce GTX TITAN Black reaches 9,177 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 780 Ti is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX TITAN Black uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,880 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 2,880 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black). Raw compute: 5.345 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 5.645 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX TITAN Black). Boost clocks: 928 MHz vs 980 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | GeForce GTX TITAN Black |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,469+3% | 9,177 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2880 | 2880 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.345 TFLOPS | 5.645 TFLOPS+6% |
| Boost Clock | 928 MHz | 980 MHz+6% |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 240 | 240 |
| L1 Cache | 240 KB | 240 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | GeForce GTX TITAN Black |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX TITAN Black has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX TITAN Black offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit vs 384-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | GeForce GTX TITAN Black |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 6 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s | 336 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | 384-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 12.0 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | GeForce GTX TITAN Black |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs NVENC 1.0 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | GeForce GTX TITAN Black |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st gen | NVENC 1.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st gen | PureVideo HD VP5 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti draws 250W versus the GeForce GTX TITAN Black's 250W — a 0% difference. The GeForce GTX TITAN Black is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 600W (GeForce GTX TITAN Black). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 83°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | GeForce GTX TITAN Black |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 600W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 83°C | 80°C-4% |
| Perf/Watt | 37.9+3% | 36.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti launched at $699 MSRP, while the GeForce GTX TITAN Black launched at $999. The GeForce GTX 780 Ti costs 30% less ($300 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 13.5 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 9.2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) — the GeForce GTX 780 Ti offers 46.7% better value. The GeForce GTX TITAN Black is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | GeForce GTX TITAN Black |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699-30% | $999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.5+47% | 9.2 |
| Codename | GK110B | GK110B |
| Release | November 7 2013 | February 18 2014 |
| Ranking | #278 | #288 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













