G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 780 Ti vs GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 780 Ti vs GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 780 Ti

2013

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌2013 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌177.8% higher power demand at 250W vs 90W.

GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU

2022

Why buy it

✅8.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 90W instead of 250W, a 160W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 13.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $699 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 8.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.2% in PassMark G3D (9,489 vs 9,469), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 3 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 28nm, and 16 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 780 Ti makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 780 Ti is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 780 Ti vs GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 780 Ti

The GeForce GTX 780 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 7 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 875 MHz to 928 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,469 points. Launch price was $699.

GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU

The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 27 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1545 MHz to 1740 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,489 points. Launch price was $199.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 780 Ti scores 9,469 and the GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU reaches 9,489 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 780 Ti is built on Kepler while the GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,880 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 2,048 (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU). Raw compute: 5.345 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 7.127 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU). Boost clocks: 928 MHz vs 1740 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 780 Ti	GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
G3D Mark Score	9,469	9,489
Architecture	Kepler	Ampere
Process Node	28 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	2880+41%	2048
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.345 TFLOPS	7.127 TFLOPS+33%
Boost Clock	928 MHz	1740 MHz+88%
ROPs	48+50%	32
TMUs	240+275%	64
L1 Cache	0.23 MB	2 MB+770%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	2 MB+33%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 780 Ti is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	GeForce GTX 780 Ti	GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 780 Ti has 3 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU carries 4 GB. GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU) — a 75% advantage for the GeForce GTX 780 Ti. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the GeForce GTX 780 Ti and 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU) — the GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 780 Ti	GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
VRAM Capacity	3 GB	4 GB+33%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	336 GB/s+75%	192 GB/s
Bus Width	384-bit+200%	128-bit
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	2 MB+33%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 780 Ti	GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
DirectX	12	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.2	1.3+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs NVENC (7th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU).

Feature	GeForce GTX 780 Ti	GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
Encoder	NVENC 1st gen	NVENC (7th Gen)
Decoder	NVDEC 1st gen	NVDEC (5th Gen)
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 780 Ti draws 250W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU's 90W — a 94.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 83°C vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 780 Ti	GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
TDP	250W	90W-64%
Recommended PSU	600W	500W-17%
Power Connector	6-pin + 8-pin	Mobile
Length	267mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	83°C-2%	85°C
Perf/Watt	37.9	105.4+178%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU (2022 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce GTX 780 Ti	GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
MSRP	$699	—
Codename	GK110B	GA107
Release	November 7 2013	January 27 2022
Ranking	#278	#276

Search GeForce GTX 780 Ti on Amazon

Search GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.