Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce GTX 780 Ti vs GRID P40-2Q

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 780 Ti

2013Core: 875 MHzBoost: 928 MHz
Buy on Amazon
VS

GRID P40-2Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz
Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 780 Ti vs GRID P40-2Q Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 780 Ti
3 GB 250
9,469
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
brand logoGeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
brand logoGeForce GTX 980 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce GTX Titan
brand logoGeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
brand logoTITAN V CEO Edition
brand logoRTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
brand logoGeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
GRID P40-2Q
4 GB 225
9,581
+1.2%
brand logoGeForce GTX 670
brand logoGeForce GTX 1050 Ti
brand logoGeForce GTX 980 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce GTX Titan
brand logoGeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
brand logoTITAN V CEO Edition
brand logoRTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
brand logoGeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 780 Ti vs GRID P40-2Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 780 Ti

2013

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $5,000 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 705.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.5 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2013 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

GRID P40-2Q

2015

Why buy it

  • ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
  • ✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • ❌
    715.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $5,699 MSRPvs$699 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.7 vs 13.5 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GRID P40-2Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.2% in PassMark G3D (9,581 vs 9,469), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 780 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 780 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $5,000 cheaper on MSRP at $699 vs $5,699, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 705.8% (13.5 vs 1.7), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GRID P40-2Q still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 780 Ti vs GRID P40-2Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 780 Ti

The GeForce GTX 780 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 7 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 875 MHz to 928 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,469 points. Launch price was $699.

NVIDIA

GRID P40-2Q

The GRID P40-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,581 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 780 Ti scores 9,469 and the GRID P40-2Q reaches 9,581 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 780 Ti is built on Kepler while the GRID P40-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,880 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 2,048 (GRID P40-2Q). Raw compute: 5.345 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P40-2Q). Boost clocks: 928 MHz vs 1178 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 780 TiGRID P40-2Q
G3D Mark Score
9,469
9,581+1%
Architecture
Kepler
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2880+41%
2048
Compute (TFLOPS)
5.345 TFLOPS+11%
4.825 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
928 MHz
1178 MHz+27%
ROPs
48
64+33%
TMUs
240+88%
128
L1 Cache
240 KB
768 KB+220%
L2 Cache
1.5 MB
2 MB+33%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 780 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID P40-2Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 780 TiGRID P40-2Q
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 780 Ti has 3 GB of VRAM, while the GRID P40-2Q carries 4 GB. GRID P40-2Q gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the GeForce GTX 780 Ti and 128-bit on the GRID P40-2Q. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 2 MB (GRID P40-2Q) — the GRID P40-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 780 TiGRID P40-2Q
VRAM Capacity
3 GB
4 GB+33%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
384-bit+200%
128-bit
L2 Cache
1.5 MB
2 MB+33%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 12.1 (GRID P40-2Q). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce GTX 780 TiGRID P40-2Q
DirectX
12
12.1
Vulkan
1.2+9%
1.1
OpenGL
4.6+2%
4.5
Max Displays
4
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs NVENC 4.0 (2x) (GRID P40-2Q). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GRID P40-2Q).

FeatureGeForce GTX 780 TiGRID P40-2Q
Encoder
NVENC 1st gen
NVENC 4.0 (2x)
Decoder
NVDEC 1st gen
PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 780 Ti draws 250W versus the GRID P40-2Q's 225W — a 10.5% difference. The GRID P40-2Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 500W (GRID P40-2Q). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 83°C vs 85°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 780 TiGRID P40-2Q
TDP
250W
225W-10%
Recommended PSU
600W
500W-17%
Power Connector
6-pin + 8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
267mm
Height
111mm
112mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
83°C-2%
85°C
Perf/Watt
37.9
42.6+12%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 780 Ti came in at $699, while the GRID P40-2Q launched at $5699. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 780 Ti was 87.7% cheaper ($5000 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 13.5 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 1.7 (GRID P40-2Q) — the GeForce GTX 780 Ti offers 694.1% better value. The newer card here is GRID P40-2Q (2015 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GTX 780 TiGRID P40-2Q
MSRP
$699-88%
$5699
Performance per Dollar
13.5+694%
1.7
Codename
GK110B
GM204
Release
November 7 2013
August 30 2015
Ranking
#278
#433
Search GeForce GTX 780 Ti on AmazonSearch GRID P40-2Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.