GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Intel Arc Pro A60
GeForce GTX 780 Ti vs Intel Arc Pro A60 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 780 Ti vs Intel Arc Pro A60 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 780 Ti vs Intel Arc Pro A60: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Intel Arc Pro A60 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌83.9% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$380 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 13.5 vs 25.0 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $380 MSRP).
Intel Arc Pro A60
2023Why buy it
- ✅0.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $319 less on MSRP ($380 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 84.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 25.0 vs 13.5 G3D/$ ($380 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 780 Ti vs Intel Arc Pro A60 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 7 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 875 MHz to 928 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,469 points. Launch price was $699.
Intel Arc Pro A60
The Intel Arc Pro A60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in June 6 2023. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,493 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti scores 9,469 and the Intel Arc Pro A60 reaches 9,493 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 780 Ti is built on Kepler while the Intel Arc Pro A60 uses Generation 12.7, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,880 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro A60). Raw compute: 5.345 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 8.397 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro A60). Boost clocks: 928 MHz vs 2050 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,469 | 9,493 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2880+41% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.345 TFLOPS | 8.397 TFLOPS+57% |
| Boost Clock | 928 MHz | 2050 MHz+121% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 240+88% | 128 |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 12 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Intel Arc Pro A60 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti has 3 GB of VRAM, while the Intel Arc Pro A60 carries 4 GB. Intel Arc Pro A60 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the GeForce GTX 780 Ti and System on the Intel Arc Pro A60. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 12 MB (Intel Arc Pro A60) — the Intel Arc Pro A60 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 4 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 12 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro A60). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs Intel Xe Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro A60). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs Intel Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro A60).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st gen | Intel Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st gen | Intel Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti draws 250W versus the Intel Arc Pro A60's 130W — a 63.2% difference. The Intel Arc Pro A60 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 500W (Intel Arc Pro A60). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 83°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 130W-48% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 83°C | 75°C-10% |
| Perf/Watt | 37.9 | 73.0+93% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 780 Ti came in at $699, while the Intel Arc Pro A60 launched at $380. On MSRP, Intel Arc Pro A60 was 45.6% cheaper ($319 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 13.5 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 25.0 (Intel Arc Pro A60) — the Intel Arc Pro A60 offers 85.2% better value. The newer card here is Intel Arc Pro A60 (2023 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699 | $380-46% |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.5 | 25.0+85% |
| Codename | GK110B | DG2-256 |
| Release | November 7 2013 | June 6 2023 |
| Ranking | #278 | #275 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 780 Ti and Intel Arc Pro A60
