GeForce GTX 780 Ti vs Intel Arc Pro A60
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Popular choices:
Intel Arc Pro A60
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Intel Arc Pro A60
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Intel Arc Pro A60 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2013). The Intel Arc Pro A60 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 780 Ti lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Intel Arc Pro A60 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (4 GB vs 3 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 780 Ti.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $42 versus $380 for the Intel Arc Pro A60, it costs 89% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 802.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+802.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($42) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($380) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 780 Ti and Intel Arc Pro A60
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 7 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 875 MHz to 928 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,469 points. Launch price was $699.
Intel Arc Pro A60
The Intel Arc Pro A60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in June 6 2023. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,493 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti scores 9,469 and the Intel Arc Pro A60 reaches 9,493 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 780 Ti is built on Kepler while the Intel Arc Pro A60 uses Generation 12.7, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,880 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro A60). Raw compute: 5.345 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 8.397 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro A60). Boost clocks: 928 MHz vs 2050 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,469 | 9,493 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2880+41% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.345 TFLOPS | 8.397 TFLOPS+57% |
| Boost Clock | 928 MHz | 2050 MHz+121% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 240+88% | 128 |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 12 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Intel Arc Pro A60 has 4 GB. The Intel Arc Pro A60 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 12 MB (Intel Arc Pro A60) — the Intel Arc Pro A60 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 4 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 12 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro A60). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs Intel Xe Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro A60). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs Intel Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro A60).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st gen | Intel Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st gen | Intel Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti draws 250W versus the Intel Arc Pro A60's 130W — a 63.2% difference. The Intel Arc Pro A60 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 500W (Intel Arc Pro A60). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 83°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 130W-48% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 83°C | 75°C-10% |
| Perf/Watt | 37.9 | 73.0+93% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti launched at $699 MSRP and currently averages $42, while the Intel Arc Pro A60 launched at $380 and now averages $380. The GeForce GTX 780 Ti costs 88.9% less ($338 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 225.5 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 25.0 (Intel Arc Pro A60) — the GeForce GTX 780 Ti offers 802% better value. The Intel Arc Pro A60 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699 | $380-46% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $42-89% | $380 |
| Performance per Dollar | 225.5+802% | 25.0 |
| Codename | GK110B | DG2-256 |
| Release | November 7 2013 | June 6 2023 |
| Ranking | #278 | #275 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 780 Ti and Intel Arc Pro A60
