GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Radeon R9 Fury
GeForce GTX 780 Ti vs Radeon R9 Fury Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 780 Ti vs Radeon R9 Fury FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 780 Ti vs Radeon R9 Fury: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 Fury across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌27.3% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$549 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 13.5 vs 17.3 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Radeon R9 Fury
2015Why buy it
- ✅14.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 28% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.3 vs 13.5 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅Measures 195mm instead of 267mm, a 72mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 780 Ti vs Radeon R9 Fury Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 7 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 875 MHz to 928 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,469 points. Launch price was $699.
Radeon R9 Fury
The Radeon R9 Fury is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 10 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,521 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti scores 9,469 and the Radeon R9 Fury reaches 9,521 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 780 Ti is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 Fury uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,880 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 3,584 (Radeon R9 Fury). Raw compute: 5.345 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 7.168 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Fury). Boost clocks: 928 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,469 | 9,521 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2880 | 3584+24% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.345 TFLOPS | 7.168 TFLOPS+34% |
| Boost Clock | 928 MHz | 1000 MHz+8% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 240+7% | 224 |
| L1 Cache | 240 KB | 896 KB+273% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 Fury leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti has 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 Fury carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 Fury gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 512 GB/s (Radeon R9 Fury) — a 52.4% advantage for the Radeon R9 Fury. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the GeForce GTX 780 Ti and 4096-bit on the Radeon R9 Fury. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 2 MB (Radeon R9 Fury) — the Radeon R9 Fury has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 4 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | HBM |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s | 512 GB/s+52% |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | 4096-bit+967% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st gen | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st gen | UVD 6.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti draws 250W versus the Radeon R9 Fury's 275W — a 9.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 780 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 600W (Radeon R9 Fury). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 195mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 83°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W-9% | 275W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 600W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 195mm |
| Height | 111mm | 115mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 83°C | 65°C-22% |
| Perf/Watt | 37.9+10% | 34.6 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 780 Ti came in at $699, while the Radeon R9 Fury launched at $549. On MSRP, Radeon R9 Fury was 21.5% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 13.5 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) vs 17.3 (Radeon R9 Fury) — the Radeon R9 Fury offers 28.1% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 Fury (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Ti | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699 | $549-21% |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.5 | 17.3+28% |
| Codename | GK110B | Fiji |
| Release | November 7 2013 | July 10 2015 |
| Ranking | #278 | #274 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 780 Ti and Radeon R9 Fury
