
GeForce GTX TITAN Black vs Tesla P4

GeForce GTX TITAN Black
Popular choices:

Tesla P4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Tesla P4
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (6 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla P4.
| Insight | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX TITAN Black holds the technical lead. Priced at $120 (vs $190), it costs 37% less, resulting in a 61.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+61.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($120) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($190) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX TITAN Black and Tesla P4

GeForce GTX TITAN Black
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 889 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,177 points. Launch price was $999.

Tesla P4
The Tesla P4 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 886 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,004 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black scores 9,177 and the Tesla P4 reaches 9,004 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX TITAN Black is built on Kepler while the Tesla P4 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,880 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 2,560 (Tesla P4). Raw compute: 5.645 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 5.704 TFLOPS (Tesla P4). Boost clocks: 980 MHz vs 1114 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,177+2% | 9,004 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2880+13% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.645 TFLOPS | 5.704 TFLOPS+1% |
| Boost Clock | 980 MHz | 1114 MHz+14% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 240+50% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 240 KB | 960 KB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla P4 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX TITAN Black offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 2 MB (Tesla P4) — the Tesla P4 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 12.1 (Tesla P4). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.4+17% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1.0 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs NVENC 6.0 (Tesla P4). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP8,VP9 (Tesla P4).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1.0 | NVENC 6.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black draws 250W versus the Tesla P4's 75W — a 107.7% difference. The Tesla P4 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 500W (Tesla P4). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 75W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 168mm |
| Height | 111mm | 53mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 36.7 | 120.1+227% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black launched at $999 MSRP and currently averages $120, while the Tesla P4 launched at $1000 and now averages $190. The GeForce GTX TITAN Black costs 36.8% less ($70 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 76.5 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 47.4 (Tesla P4) — the GeForce GTX TITAN Black offers 61.4% better value. The Tesla P4 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $1000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $120-37% | $190 |
| Performance per Dollar | 76.5+61% | 47.4 |
| Codename | GK110B | GP104 |
| Release | February 18 2014 | September 13 2016 |
| Ranking | #288 | #293 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















