GeForce GTX TITAN Black
Radeon R9 Fury X
GeForce GTX TITAN Black vs Radeon R9 Fury X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX TITAN Black vs Radeon R9 Fury X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX TITAN Black vs Radeon R9 Fury X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX TITAN Black
2014Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 Fury X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2014 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌53.9% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$649 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.2 vs 14.5 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ❌36.9% longer card at 267mm vs 195mm.
Radeon R9 Fury X
2015Why buy it
- ✅0.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $350 less on MSRP ($649 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 57.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.5 vs 9.2 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 195mm instead of 267mm, a 72mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX TITAN Black vs Radeon R9 Fury X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX TITAN Black
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 889 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,177 points. Launch price was $999.
Radeon R9 Fury X
The Radeon R9 Fury X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 24 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,382 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black scores 9,177 and the Radeon R9 Fury X reaches 9,382 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX TITAN Black is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 Fury X uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,880 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 4,096 (Radeon R9 Fury X). Raw compute: 5.645 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Fury X). Boost clocks: 980 MHz vs 1050 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Radeon R9 Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,177 | 9,382+2% |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2880 | 4096+42% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.645 TFLOPS | 8.602 TFLOPS+52% |
| Boost Clock | 980 MHz | 1050 MHz+7% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 240 | 256+7% |
| L1 Cache | 0.23 MB | 1 MB+335% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 Fury X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Radeon R9 Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 Fury X carries 4 GB. GeForce GTX TITAN Black gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 512 GB/s (Radeon R9 Fury X) — a 52.4% advantage for the Radeon R9 Fury X. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the GeForce GTX TITAN Black and 4096-bit on the Radeon R9 Fury X. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 2 MB (Radeon R9 Fury X) — the Radeon R9 Fury X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Radeon R9 Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | HBM |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s | 512 GB/s+52% |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | 4096-bit+967% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury X). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Radeon R9 Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1.0 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury X). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury X).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Radeon R9 Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1.0 | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | UVD 6.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black draws 250W versus the Radeon R9 Fury X's 275W — a 9.5% difference. The GeForce GTX TITAN Black is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 600W (Radeon R9 Fury X). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 195mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 60°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Radeon R9 Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W-9% | 275W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 600W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 195mm |
| Height | 111mm | 115mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 60°C-25% |
| Perf/Watt | 36.7+8% | 34.1 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX TITAN Black came in at $999, while the Radeon R9 Fury X launched at $649. On MSRP, Radeon R9 Fury X was 35% cheaper ($350 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 14.5 (Radeon R9 Fury X) — the Radeon R9 Fury X offers 57.6% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 Fury X (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Radeon R9 Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $649-35% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.2 | 14.5+58% |
| Codename | GK110B | Fiji |
| Release | February 18 2014 | June 24 2015 |
| Ranking | #288 | #282 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX TITAN Black and Radeon R9 Fury X
