GeForce GTX TITAN Black
Radeon Pro 5600M
GeForce GTX TITAN Black vs Radeon Pro 5600M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX TITAN Black vs Radeon Pro 5600M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX TITAN Black vs Radeon Pro 5600M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX TITAN Black
2014Why buy it
- ✅4.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2014 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌400% higher power demand at 250W vs 50W.
Radeon Pro 5600M
2020Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 250W, a 200W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX TITAN Black across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX TITAN Black vs Radeon Pro 5600M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTX TITAN Black
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 889 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,177 points. Launch price was $999.
Radeon Pro 5600M
The Radeon Pro 5600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 15 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,324 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black scores 9,177 and the Radeon Pro 5600M reaches 9,324 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX TITAN Black is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro 5600M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,880 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 2,560 (Radeon Pro 5600M). Raw compute: 5.645 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 5.274 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5600M). Boost clocks: 980 MHz vs 1030 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,177 | 9,324+2% |
| Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2880+13% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.645 TFLOPS+7% | 5.274 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 980 MHz | 1030 MHz+5% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 240+50% | 160 |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 4 MB+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro 5600M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5600M carries 8 GB. Radeon Pro 5600M gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the GeForce GTX TITAN Black and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro 5600M. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5600M) — the Radeon Pro 5600M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 4 MB+167% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5600M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1.0 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5600M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5600M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX TITAN Black draws 250W versus the Radeon Pro 5600M's 50W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon Pro 5600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 500W (Radeon Pro 5600M). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 90°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 50W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-11% | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 36.7 | 186.5+408% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon Pro 5600M (2020 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Black | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | — |
| Codename | GK110B | Navi 12 |
| Release | February 18 2014 | June 15 2020 |
| Ranking | #288 | #283 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX TITAN Black and Radeon Pro 5600M
