GeForce GTX TITAN Black vs Radeon RX 590

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX TITAN Black

2014Core: 889 MHzBoost: 980 MHz
Similar parts
·····
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 590

2018Core: 1469 MHzBoost: 1545 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX TITAN Black vs Radeon RX 590 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX TITAN Black vs Radeon RX 590 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX TITAN Black vs Radeon RX 590: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX TITAN Black

2014

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 590 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • 2014 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 258.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $999 MSRPvs$279 MSRP

Radeon RX 590

2018

Why buy it

  • 17.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $720 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
  • Delivers 263.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.4 vs 9.2 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • 33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon RX 590 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 17.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.5% in PassMark G3D (9,315 vs 9,177), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX 590 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 6 GB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) and FSR Frame Generation (2023), while GeForce GTX TITAN Black is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 12nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2014. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 590 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $720 cheaper on MSRP at $279 vs $999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 263.4% (33.4 vs 9.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX TITAN Black vs Radeon RX 590 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX TITAN Black

The GeForce GTX TITAN Black is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 889 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,177 points. Launch price was $999.

AMD

Radeon RX 590

The Radeon RX 590 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 15 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1469 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,315 points. Launch price was $279.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX TITAN Black scores 9,177 and the Radeon RX 590 reaches 9,315 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX TITAN Black is built on Kepler while the Radeon RX 590 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,880 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 590). Raw compute: 5.645 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 7.119 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 590). Boost clocks: 980 MHz vs 1545 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX TITAN BlackRadeon RX 590
G3D Mark Score
9,177
9,315+2%
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
2880+25%
2304
Compute (TFLOPS)
5.645 TFLOPS
7.119 TFLOPS+26%
Boost Clock
980 MHz
1545 MHz+58%
ROPs
48+50%
32
TMUs
240+67%
144
L1 Cache
240 KB
576 KB+140%
L2 Cache
1.5 MB
2 MB+33%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 590 is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce GTX TITAN Black does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce GTX TITAN Black gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 590 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX TITAN BlackRadeon RX 590
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX TITAN Black has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 590 carries 8 GB. Radeon RX 590 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 256 GB/s (Radeon RX 590) — a 31.3% advantage for the GeForce GTX TITAN Black. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the GeForce GTX TITAN Black and 256-bit on the Radeon RX 590. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 590) — the Radeon RX 590 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX TITAN BlackRadeon RX 590
VRAM Capacity
6 GB
8 GB+33%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
336 GB/s+31%
256 GB/s
Bus Width
384-bit+50%
256-bit
L2 Cache
1.5 MB
2 MB+33%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.0 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX 590). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX TITAN BlackRadeon RX 590
DirectX
12.0
12.0
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1.0 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 590). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 590).

FeatureGeForce GTX TITAN BlackRadeon RX 590
Encoder
NVENC 1.0
VCE 3.4
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP5
UVD 6.3
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX TITAN Black draws 250W versus the Radeon RX 590's 175W — a 35.3% difference. The Radeon RX 590 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 500W (Radeon RX 590). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX TITAN BlackRadeon RX 590
TDP
250W
175W-30%
Recommended PSU
600W
500W-17%
Power Connector
6-pin + 8-pin
8-pin
Length
267mm
241mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
80°C
80°C
Perf/Watt
36.7
53.2+45%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX TITAN Black came in at $999, while the Radeon RX 590 launched at $279. On MSRP, Radeon RX 590 was 72.1% cheaper ($720 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Black) vs 33.4 (Radeon RX 590) — the Radeon RX 590 offers 263% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 590 (2018 vs 2014).

FeatureGeForce GTX TITAN BlackRadeon RX 590
MSRP
$999
$279-72%
Performance per Dollar
9.2
33.4+263%
Codename
GK110B
Polaris 30
Release
February 18 2014
November 15 2018
Ranking
#288
#285

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.