
Quadro P5200 Max-Q vs GeForce GTX 980M SLI

Quadro P5200 Max-Q
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 980M SLI
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P5200 Max-Q
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 980M SLI
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro P5200 Max-Q uses modern memory architecture. The Quadro P5200 Max-Q likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 980M SLI lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 980M SLI is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P5200 Max-Q.
| Insight | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | GeForce GTX 980M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 980M SLI remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P5200 Max-Q and GeForce GTX 980M SLI

Quadro P5200 Max-Q
The Quadro P5200 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1316 MHz to 1569 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,308 points.

GeForce GTX 980M SLI
The GeForce GTX 980M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 7 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1038 MHz to 1127 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,523 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P5200 Max-Q scores 12,308 and the GeForce GTX 980M SLI reaches 12,523 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P5200 Max-Q is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 980M SLI uses Maxwell, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Quadro P5200 Max-Q) vs 3,072 (GeForce GTX 980M SLI). Boost clocks: 1569 MHz vs 1127 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | GeForce GTX 980M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,308 | 12,523+2% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 3072+20% |
| Boost Clock | 1569 MHz+39% | 1127 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | GeForce GTX 980M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P5200 Max-Q comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 980M SLI has 8 GB. The GeForce GTX 980M SLI offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | GeForce GTX 980M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P5200 Max-Q) vs 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980M SLI). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | GeForce GTX 980M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5+2% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5.0 (Quadro P5200 Max-Q) vs NVENC 4.0 (2x) (GeForce GTX 980M SLI). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP7 vs PureVideo HD VP6 (2x). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P5200 Max-Q) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 980M SLI).
| Feature | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | GeForce GTX 980M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5.0 | NVENC 4.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP7 | PureVideo HD VP6 (2x) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P5200 Max-Q draws 100W versus the GeForce GTX 980M SLI's 200W — a 66.7% difference. The Quadro P5200 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P5200 Max-Q) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 980M SLI). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | GeForce GTX 980M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-50% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 123.1+97% | 62.6 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















