Quadro P5200 Max-Q vs Arc A750
Quadro P5200 Max-Q
Popular choices:
Arc A750
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P5200 Max-Q
Performance Per Dollar Arc A750
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc A750 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P5200 Max-Q.
| Insight | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) / 6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (268mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Arc A750 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P5200 Max-Q and Arc A750
Quadro P5200 Max-Q
The Quadro P5200 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1316 MHz to 1569 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,308 points.
Arc A750
The Arc A750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2050 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,600 points. Launch price was $289.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P5200 Max-Q scores 12,308 and the Arc A750 reaches 12,600 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P5200 Max-Q is built on Pascal while the Arc A750 uses Generation 12.7, both on 16 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Quadro P5200 Max-Q) vs 3,584 (Arc A750). Raw compute: 8.033 TFLOPS (Quadro P5200 Max-Q) vs 17.2 TFLOPS (Arc A750). Boost clocks: 1569 MHz vs 2400 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,308 | 12,600+2% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 3584+40% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.033 TFLOPS | 17.2 TFLOPS+114% |
| Boost Clock | 1569 MHz | 2400 MHz+53% |
| ROPs | 64 | 112+75% |
| TMUs | 160 | 224+40% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 16 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P5200 Max-Q comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Arc A750 has 8 GB. The Arc A750 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro P5200 Max-Q) vs 16 MB (Arc A750) — the Arc A750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 16 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P5200 Max-Q) vs 12 Ultimate (Arc A750). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5.0 (Quadro P5200 Max-Q) vs Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A750). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP7 vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P5200 Max-Q) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A750).
| Feature | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5.0 | Dual Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP7 | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P5200 Max-Q draws 100W versus the Arc A750's 225W — a 76.9% difference. The Quadro P5200 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P5200 Max-Q) vs 650W (Arc A750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin + 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 268mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 78°C.
| Feature | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-56% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-23% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin + 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 268mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 78°C-8% |
| Perf/Watt | 123.1+120% | 56.0 |
Value Analysis
The Arc A750 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2018).
| Feature | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $289 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $229 |
| Codename | GP104 | DG2-512 |
| Release | February 21 2018 | October 12 2022 |
| Ranking | #217 | #212 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P5200 Max-Q and Arc A750
