GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Arc A750
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:
Arc A750
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Performance Per Dollar Arc A750
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 79.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc A750.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+79.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-79.8%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) / 6nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (268mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $380 (vs $229), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 8.3% better value per dollar than the Arc A750.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+8.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($380) | ✅More affordable ($229) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Arc A750
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.
Arc A750
The Arc A750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2050 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,600 points. Launch price was $289.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Arc A750's 12,600 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 79.8%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Arc A750 uses Generation 12.7, both on 5 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 3,584 (Arc A750). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 17.2 TFLOPS (Arc A750). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2400 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 28 (Arc A750) with 136 Tensor cores vs 448.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+80% | 12,600 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+21% | 3584 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+28% | 17.2 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+6% | 2400 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 112+133% |
| TMUs | 136 | 224+65% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+100% | 16 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34+21% | 28 |
| Tensor Cores | 136 | 448+229% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Arc A750 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Arc A750 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 512 GB/s (Arc A750) — a 77.8% advantage for the Arc A750. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 16 MB (Arc A750) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 512 GB/s+78% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+100% | 16 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (Arc A750). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A750). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A750).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | Dual Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Arc A750's 225W — a 33.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 650W (Arc A750). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin + 6-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 268mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 78°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-29% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-15% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin + 6-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 268mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-10% | 78°C |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+153% | 56.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP and currently averages $380, while the Arc A750 launched at $289 and now averages $229. The Arc A750 costs 39.7% less ($151 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 59.6 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 55.0 (Arc A750) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 8.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $289-28% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $380 | $229-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 59.6+8% | 55.0 |
| Codename | AD106 | DG2-512 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | October 12 2022 |
| Ranking | #59 | #212 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Arc A750
