GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs Arc A750
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Arc A750
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Performance Per Dollar Arc A750
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 150.6% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (12 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc A750.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+150.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-150.6%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) / 6nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (285mm) | Standard Size (268mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Arc A750 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $229 versus $590 for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, it costs 61% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 2.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($590) | ✅More affordable ($229) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Arc A750
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Arc A750
The Arc A750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2050 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,600 points. Launch price was $289.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 31,578 versus the Arc A750's 12,600 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 150.6%. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Arc A750 uses Generation 12.7, both on 4 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 3,584 (Arc A750). Raw compute: 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 17.2 TFLOPS (Arc A750). Boost clocks: 2610 MHz vs 2400 MHz. Ray tracing: 60 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 28 (Arc A750) with 240 Tensor cores vs 448.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 31,578+151% | 12,600 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 7680+114% | 3584 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 40.09 TFLOPS+133% | 17.2 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2610 MHz+9% | 2400 MHz |
| ROPs | 80 | 112+40% |
| TMUs | 240+7% | 224 |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+200% | 16 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 60+114% | 28 |
| Tensor Cores | 240 | 448+87% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Arc A750 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Arc A750 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Arc A750 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 512 GB/s (Arc A750) — a 1.6% advantage for the Arc A750. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 16 MB (Arc A750) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 504 GB/s | 512 GB/s+2% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+200% | 16 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (Arc A750). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A750). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A750).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | Dual Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti draws 285W versus the Arc A750's 225W — a 23.5% difference. The Arc A750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 650W (Arc A750). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin + 6-pin. Card length: 285mm vs 268mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 78°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 285W | 225W-21% |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 650W-7% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin + 6-pin |
| Length | 285mm | 268mm |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-10% | 78°C |
| Perf/Watt | 110.8+98% | 56.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 MSRP and currently averages $590, while the Arc A750 launched at $289 and now averages $229. The Arc A750 costs 61.2% less ($361 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 53.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) vs 55.0 (Arc A750) — the Arc A750 offers 2.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $289-64% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $590 | $229-61% |
| Performance per Dollar | 53.5 | 55.0+3% |
| Codename | AD104 | DG2-512 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | October 12 2022 |
| Ranking | #11 | #212 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Arc A750
