Quadro P5200 Max-Q vs Radeon PRO V710

NVIDIA

Quadro P5200 Max-Q

2018Core: 1316 MHzBoost: 1569 MHz
Similar parts
VS
AMD

Radeon PRO V710

2024Core: 1900 MHzBoost: 2000 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro P5200 Max-Q vs Radeon PRO V710 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro P5200 Max-Q vs Radeon PRO V710 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro P5200 Max-Q vs Radeon PRO V710: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro P5200 Max-Q

2018

Why buy it

  • Draws 100W instead of 158W, a 58W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO V710 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).

Radeon PRO V710

2024

Why buy it

  • 57.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 58% higher power demand at 158W vs 100W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon PRO V710 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 57.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro P5200 Max-Q instead at 12,308 vs 12,000, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon PRO V710 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 5nm process instead of 16nm, and 54 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon PRO V710 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro P5200 Max-Q vs Radeon PRO V710 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro P5200 Max-Q

The Quadro P5200 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1316 MHz to 1569 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,308 points.

AMD

Radeon PRO V710

The Radeon PRO V710 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 3 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1900 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 3456 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 158W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 54 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,000 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P5200 Max-Q scores 12,308 and the Radeon PRO V710 reaches 12,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P5200 Max-Q is built on Pascal while the Radeon PRO V710 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 16 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Quadro P5200 Max-Q) vs 3,456 (Radeon PRO V710). Raw compute: 8.033 TFLOPS (Quadro P5200 Max-Q) vs 27.65 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO V710). Boost clocks: 1569 MHz vs 2000 MHz.

FeatureQuadro P5200 Max-QRadeon PRO V710
G3D Mark Score
12,308+3%
12,000
Architecture
Pascal
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
16 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
2560
3456+35%
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.033 TFLOPS
27.65 TFLOPS+244%
Boost Clock
1569 MHz
2000 MHz+27%
ROPs
64
96+50%
TMUs
160
216+35%
L1 Cache
960 KB+25%
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro P5200 Max-QRadeon PRO V710
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P5200 Max-Q has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO V710 carries 8 GB. Radeon PRO V710 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro P5200 Max-Q and 256-bit on the Radeon PRO V710.

FeatureQuadro P5200 Max-QRadeon PRO V710
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
8 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit
256-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P5200 Max-Q) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO V710). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

FeatureQuadro P5200 Max-QRadeon PRO V710
DirectX
12.1
12.2
Vulkan
1.1
1.3+18%
OpenGL
4.5
4.6+2%
Max Displays
4
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5.0 (Quadro P5200 Max-Q) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO V710). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP7 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P5200 Max-Q) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO V710).

FeatureQuadro P5200 Max-QRadeon PRO V710
Encoder
NVENC 5.0
VCN 4.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP7
VCN 4.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P5200 Max-Q draws 100W versus the Radeon PRO V710's 158W — a 45% difference. The Quadro P5200 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P5200 Max-Q) vs 500W (Radeon PRO V710). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.

FeatureQuadro P5200 Max-QRadeon PRO V710
TDP
100W-37%
158W
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
267mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
85°C
80°C-6%
Perf/Watt
123.1+62%
75.9
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon PRO V710 (2024 vs 2018).

FeatureQuadro P5200 Max-QRadeon PRO V710
MSRP
$2000
Codename
GP104
Navi 32
Release
February 21 2018
October 3 2024
Ranking
#217
#196

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.