
Quadro P5200 Max-Q
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO V710
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro P5200 Max-Q
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 158W, a 58W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
Radeon PRO V710
2024Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌58% higher power demand at 158W vs 100W.
Quadro P5200 Max-Q
2018Radeon PRO V710
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 158W, a 58W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌58% higher power demand at 158W vs 100W.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro P5200 Max-Q better than Radeon PRO V710?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon PRO V710 make more sense than Quadro P5200 Max-Q?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 155 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 49 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 53 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 248 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 416 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 270 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 341 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 277 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 230 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 191 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 97 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 91 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 554 FPS | 540 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 432 FPS |
| high | 369 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 270 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 415 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 332 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 208 FPS | 202 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 222 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 185 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 135 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 540 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 432 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 178 FPS | 270 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 233 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 185 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 202 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 135 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P5200 Max-Q and Radeon PRO V710

Quadro P5200 Max-Q
Quadro P5200 Max-Q
The Quadro P5200 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1316 MHz to 1569 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,308 points.

Radeon PRO V710
Radeon PRO V710
The Radeon PRO V710 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 3 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1900 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 3456 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 158W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 54 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P5200 Max-Q scores 12,308 and the Radeon PRO V710 reaches 12,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P5200 Max-Q is built on Pascal while the Radeon PRO V710 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 16 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Quadro P5200 Max-Q) vs 3,456 (Radeon PRO V710). Raw compute: 8.033 TFLOPS (Quadro P5200 Max-Q) vs 27.65 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO V710). Boost clocks: 1569 MHz vs 2000 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,308+3% | 12,000 |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 3456+35% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.033 TFLOPS | 27.65 TFLOPS+244% |
| Boost Clock | 1569 MHz | 2000 MHz+27% |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 160 | 216+35% |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+25% | 768 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P5200 Max-Q comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO V710 has 8 GB. The Radeon PRO V710 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P5200 Max-Q) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO V710). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5.0 (Quadro P5200 Max-Q) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO V710). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP7 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P5200 Max-Q) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO V710).
| Feature | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP7 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P5200 Max-Q draws 100W versus the Radeon PRO V710's 158W — a 45% difference. The Quadro P5200 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro P5200 Max-Q) vs 500W (Radeon PRO V710). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-37% | 158W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 123.1+62% | 75.9 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO V710 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2018).
| Feature | Quadro P5200 Max-Q | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $2000 |
| Codename | GP104 | Navi 32 |
| Release | February 21 2018 | October 3 2024 |
| Ranking | #217 | #196 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













