Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
VS
GeForce GTX 1650

Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) vs GeForce GTX 1650

NVIDIA

Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

2019Core: 945 MHzBoost: 1380 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

#26
Radeon Pro Vega 48
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
139%
#27
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
MSRP: $500|Avg: $280
138%
#28
Quadro P5200
MSRP: $500|Avg: $240
129%
#29
Radeon PRO W7700
MSRP: $999|Avg: $999
128%
#30
Radeon PRO W6600
MSRP: $649|Avg: $649
127%
#32
Radeon AI PRO R9700
MSRP: $1299|Avg: $1450
122%
#33
Radeon Pro Vega 64
MSRP: $599|Avg: $114
119%
#38
Radeon PRO W6600X
MSRP: $699|Avg: $699
104%
#41
Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
100%
#42
Radeon Pro W5700
MSRP: $799|Avg: $300
100%
#43
Radeon Pro W5700X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $999
98%
#44
RTX A4000
MSRP: $1111|Avg: $1111
97%
#45
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
MSRP: $849|Avg: $748
94%
#46
Quadro RTX 4000
MSRP: $899|Avg: $220
92%
#49
RTX 2000E Ada Generation
MSRP: $999|Avg: $999
85%
#50
83%
#51
RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $2015
82%
#52
RTX A1000
MSRP: $749|Avg: $500
80%
#54
Radeon Pro 5700
MSRP: $799|Avg: $250
80%
#55
Quadro P4000
MSRP: $815|Avg: $290
78%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 37.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.

InsightQuadro RTX 3000 (móvel)GeForce GTX 1650
Performance
Leading raw performance (+37.6%)
Lower raw frame rates (-37.6%)
Longevity
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem
✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
🎮 High Capacity (4 GB)
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $600 for the Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel), it costs 88% less. While it maintains lower overall performance, this results in a 481.3% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightQuadro RTX 3000 (móvel)GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+481.3%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($600)
More affordable ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) and GeForce GTX 1650

NVIDIA

Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

The Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 945 MHz to 1380 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,829 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) scores 10,829 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) leads by 37.6%. The Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) is built on Turing while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 6.359 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1380 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

FeatureQuadro RTX 3000 (móvel)GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score
10,829+38%
7,869
Architecture
Turing
Turing
Process Node
12 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
2304+157%
896
Compute (TFLOPS)
6.359 TFLOPS+113%
2.984 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
1665 MHz+21%
ROPs
64+100%
32
TMUs
144+157%
56
L1 Cache
2.3 MB+161%
0.88 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB+300%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GeForce GTX 1650 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureQuadro RTX 3000 (móvel)GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2.0
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible)
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro RTX 3000 (móvel)GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
4 MB+300%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureQuadro RTX 3000 (móvel)GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX
12.1
12
Vulkan
1.0
1.4+40%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

FeatureQuadro RTX 3000 (móvel)GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder
7th Gen NVENC
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder
5th Gen NVDEC
NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) draws 80W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 6.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.

FeatureQuadro RTX 3000 (móvel)GeForce GTX 1650
TDP
80W
75W-6%
Recommended PSU
500W
300W-40%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
0mm
229mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
70°C-18%
Perf/Watt
135.4+29%
104.9
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) launched at $600 MSRP and currently averages $600, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 87.5% less ($525 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 18.0 (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 482.8% better value.

FeatureQuadro RTX 3000 (móvel)GeForce GTX 1650
MSRP
$600
$149-75%
Avg Price (30d)
$600
$75-88%
Performance per Dollar
18.0
104.9+483%
Codename
TU106
TU117
Release
May 27 2019
April 23 2019
Ranking
#261
#323