
Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) vs GeForce GTX 1650

Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 37.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.
| Insight | Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+37.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-37.6%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $600 for the Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel), it costs 88% less. While it maintains lower overall performance, this results in a 481.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+481.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($600) | ✅More affordable ($75) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) and GeForce GTX 1650

Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
The Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 945 MHz to 1380 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,829 points.

GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) scores 10,829 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) leads by 37.6%. The Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) is built on Turing while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 6.359 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1380 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,829+38% | 7,869 |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+157% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.359 TFLOPS+113% | 2.984 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1380 MHz | 1665 MHz+21% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 144+157% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+161% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GeForce GTX 1650 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.4+40% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 4th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) draws 80W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 6.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W | 75W-6% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 300W-40% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 0mm | 229mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 70°C-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 135.4+29% | 104.9 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) launched at $600 MSRP and currently averages $600, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 87.5% less ($525 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 18.0 (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 482.8% better value.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $600 | $149-75% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $600 | $75-88% |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.0 | 104.9+483% |
| Codename | TU106 | TU117 |
| Release | May 27 2019 | April 23 2019 |
| Ranking | #261 | #323 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















