
Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

RTX A1000
Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) vs RTX A1000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) vs RTX A1000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) vs RTX A1000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
2019Why buy it
- ✅3.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $149 less on MSRP ($600 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 25% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.0 vs 14.4 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌RTX A1000 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌60% higher power demand at 80W vs 50W.
RTX A1000
2024Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 80W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌24.8% HIGHER MSRP$749 MSRPvs$600 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.4 vs 18.0 G3D/$ ($749 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) vs RTX A1000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
The Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 945 MHz to 1380 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,829 points.

RTX A1000
The RTX A1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 727 MHz to 1462 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,814 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) scores 10,829 and the RTX A1000 reaches 10,814 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) is built on Turing while the RTX A1000 uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)) vs 2,304 (RTX A1000). Raw compute: 6.359 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)) vs 6.737 TFLOPS (RTX A1000). Boost clocks: 1380 MHz vs 1462 MHz. Ray tracing: 36 RT cores (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)) vs 18 (RTX A1000) with 288 Tensor cores vs 72.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) | RTX A1000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,829 | 10,814 |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.359 TFLOPS | 6.737 TFLOPS+6% |
| Boost Clock | 1380 MHz | 1462 MHz+6% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 144+100% | 72 |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 2.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 36+100% | 18 |
| Tensor Cores | 288+300% | 72 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A1000 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) | RTX A1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) has 4 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A1000 carries 8 GB. RTX A1000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) and 128-bit on the RTX A1000. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)) vs 2 MB (RTX A1000) — the Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) | RTX A1000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)) vs 12.2 (RTX A1000). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) | RTX A1000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.3+30% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A1000). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A1000).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) | RTX A1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) draws 80W versus the RTX A1000's 50W — a 46.2% difference. The RTX A1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)) vs 500W (RTX A1000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 163mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) | RTX A1000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W | 50W-38% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 163mm |
| Height | 0mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 135.4 | 216.3+60% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) came in at $600, while the RTX A1000 launched at $749. On MSRP, Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) was 19.9% cheaper ($149 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 18.0 (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)) vs 14.4 (RTX A1000) — the Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) offers 25% better value. The newer card here is RTX A1000 (2024 vs 2019).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) | RTX A1000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $600-20% | $749 |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.0+25% | 14.4 |
| Codename | TU106 | GA107 |
| Release | May 27 2019 | April 16 2024 |
| Ranking | #261 | #251 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














