Quadro RTX 3000 vs Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

NVIDIA

Quadro RTX 3000

2018Core: 1395 MHzBoost: 1770 MHz
Similar parts
·
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

2019Core: 945 MHzBoost: 1380 MHz
Similar parts
·

Quadro RTX 3000 vs Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro RTX 3000 vs Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro RTX 3000 vs Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro RTX 3000

2018

Why buy it

  • 58.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (576 vs 288).
  • 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 33.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $800 MSRPvs$600 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 13.6 vs 18.0 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
  • 225% higher power demand at 260W vs 80W.

Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

2019

Why buy it

  • Costs $200 less on MSRP ($600 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
  • Delivers 33% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.0 vs 13.6 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 80W instead of 260W, a 180W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 3000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (288 vs 576), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro RTX 3000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 58.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.3% in PassMark G3D (10,858 vs 10,829), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2019 generation instead of 2018. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) makes the most sense to buy today. It is $200 cheaper on MSRP at $600 vs $800, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 33% (18.0 vs 13.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro RTX 3000 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro RTX 3000 vs Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro RTX 3000

The Quadro RTX 3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,858 points. Launch price was $9,999.

NVIDIA

Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

The Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 945 MHz to 1380 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,829 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro RTX 3000 scores 10,858 and the Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) reaches 10,829 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 3000 is built on Turing while the Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 4,608 (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 2,304 (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 16.31 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 6.359 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 1380 MHz. Ray tracing: 72 RT cores (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 36 (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)) with 576 Tensor cores vs 288.

FeatureQuadro RTX 3000Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
G3D Mark Score
10,858
10,829
Architecture
Turing
Turing
Process Node
12 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
4608+100%
2304
Compute (TFLOPS)
16.31 TFLOPS+156%
6.359 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1770 MHz+28%
1380 MHz
ROPs
96+50%
64
TMUs
288+100%
144
L1 Cache
4.5 MB+96%
2.3 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB+50%
4 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
72+100%
36
Tensor Cores
576+100%
288

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro RTX 3000Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro RTX 3000 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) carries 4 GB. Quadro RTX 3000 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 3000 and 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel). L2 Cache: 6 MB (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 4 MB (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)) — the Quadro RTX 3000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro RTX 3000Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
VRAM Capacity
6 GB+50%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit
256-bit
L2 Cache
6 MB+50%
4 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 12.1 (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureQuadro RTX 3000Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
DirectX
12.1
12.1
Vulkan
1.0
1.0
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 3000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)).

FeatureQuadro RTX 3000Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
Encoder
7th Gen NVENC
7th Gen NVENC
Decoder
5th Gen NVDEC
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro RTX 3000 draws 260W versus the Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)'s 80W — a 105.9% difference. The Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.

FeatureQuadro RTX 3000Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
TDP
260W
80W-69%
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
85°C
Perf/Watt
41.8
135.4+224%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro RTX 3000 came in at $800, while the Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) launched at $600. On MSRP, Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) was 25% cheaper ($200 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 13.6 (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 18.0 (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)) — the Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) offers 32.4% better value. The newer card here is Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) (2019 vs 2018).

FeatureQuadro RTX 3000Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
MSRP
$800
$600-25%
Performance per Dollar
13.6
18.0+32%
Codename
TU102
TU106
Release
August 13 2018
May 27 2019
Ranking
#78
#261

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.