
Quadro RTX 3000

Radeon Pro Vega 48
Quadro RTX 3000 vs Radeon Pro Vega 48 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro RTX 3000 vs Radeon Pro Vega 48 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro RTX 3000 vs Radeon Pro Vega 48: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro RTX 3000
2018Why buy it
- ✅65.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Radeon Pro Vega 48 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro RTX 3000 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌77.8% HIGHER MSRP$800 MSRPvs$450 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 13.6 vs 25.0 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ❌766.7% higher power demand at 260W vs 30W.
Radeon Pro Vega 48
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $350 less on MSRP ($450 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 84.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 25.0 vs 13.6 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 260W, a 230W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 3000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌2019 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro RTX 3000 vs Radeon Pro Vega 48 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro RTX 3000
The Quadro RTX 3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,858 points. Launch price was $9,999.

Radeon Pro Vega 48
The Radeon Pro Vega 48 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 19 2019. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1300 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,270 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 3000 scores 10,858 and the Radeon Pro Vega 48 reaches 11,270 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 3000 is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro Vega 48 uses GCN 5.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 3,072 (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Raw compute: 16.31 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 1300 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 3000 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,858 | 11,270+4% |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608+50% | 3072 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.31 TFLOPS+104% | 7.987 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1770 MHz+36% | 1300 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 288+50% | 192 |
| L1 Cache | 4.5 MB+500% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The Quadro RTX 3000 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro Vega 48 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 3000 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX 3000 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 48 carries 0 MB. Quadro RTX 3000 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 3000 and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro Vega 48. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 48) — the Quadro RTX 3000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 3000 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 3000 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.3+30% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 3000) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 3000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 48).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 3000 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 3000 draws 260W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 48's 30W — a 158.6% difference. The Radeon Pro Vega 48 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 3000 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 260W | 30W-88% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 41.8 | 375.7+799% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro RTX 3000 came in at $800, while the Radeon Pro Vega 48 launched at $450. On MSRP, Radeon Pro Vega 48 was 43.8% cheaper ($350 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 13.6 (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 25.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 48) — the Radeon Pro Vega 48 offers 83.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro Vega 48 (2019 vs 2018).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 3000 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $800 | $450-44% |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.6 | 25.0+84% |
| Codename | TU102 | Vega 10 |
| Release | August 13 2018 | March 19 2019 |
| Ranking | #78 | #241 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














