Quadro RTX 3000
Radeon Pro SSG
Quadro RTX 3000 vs Radeon Pro SSG Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro RTX 3000 vs Radeon Pro SSG FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro RTX 3000 vs Radeon Pro SSG: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro RTX 3000
2018Why buy it
- ✅33.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $6,199 less on MSRP ($800 MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 765.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.6 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs $6,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Radeon Pro SSG is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Quadro RTX 3000 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Radeon Pro SSG
2016Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 3000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌774.9% HIGHER MSRP$6,999 MSRPvs$800 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.6 vs 13.6 G3D/$ ($6,999 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro RTX 3000 vs Radeon Pro SSG Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Quadro RTX 3000
The Quadro RTX 3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,858 points. Launch price was $9,999.
Radeon Pro SSG
The Radeon Pro SSG is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 26 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,972 points. Launch price was $9,999.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 3000 scores 10,858 and the Radeon Pro SSG reaches 10,972 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 3000 is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro SSG uses GCN 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro SSG). Raw compute: 16.31 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro SSG). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 1050 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 3000 | Radeon Pro SSG |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,858 | 10,972+1% |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608+13% | 4096 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.31 TFLOPS+90% | 8.602 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1770 MHz+69% | 1050 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 288+13% | 256 |
| L1 Cache | 4.5 MB+350% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The Quadro RTX 3000 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro SSG leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 3000 | Radeon Pro SSG |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX 3000 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro SSG carries 8 GB. Radeon Pro SSG gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 3000 and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro SSG. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro SSG) — the Quadro RTX 3000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 3000 | Radeon Pro SSG |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro SSG). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 3000 | Radeon Pro SSG |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.3+30% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 3000) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro SSG). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 3000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro SSG).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 3000 | Radeon Pro SSG |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 3000 draws 260W versus the Radeon Pro SSG's 260W — a 0% difference. The Radeon Pro SSG is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 500W (Radeon Pro SSG). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 3000 | Radeon Pro SSG |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 260W | 260W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 41.8 | 42.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro RTX 3000 came in at $800, while the Radeon Pro SSG launched at $6999. On MSRP, Quadro RTX 3000 was 88.6% cheaper ($6199 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 13.6 (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 1.6 (Radeon Pro SSG) — the Quadro RTX 3000 offers 750% better value. The newer card here is Quadro RTX 3000 (2018 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 3000 | Radeon Pro SSG |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $800-89% | $6999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.6+750% | 1.6 |
| Codename | TU102 | Fiji |
| Release | August 13 2018 | July 26 2016 |
| Ranking | #78 | #249 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro RTX 3000 and Radeon Pro SSG
