Quadro RTX 3000 vs RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

NVIDIA

Quadro RTX 3000

2018Core: 1395 MHzBoost: 1770 MHz
Similar parts
·
VS
NVIDIA

RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

2024Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 2025 MHz
RTX family
·······

Quadro RTX 3000 vs RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro RTX 3000 vs RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro RTX 3000 vs RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro RTX 3000

2018

Why buy it

  • 41.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 800% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (576 vs 64).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
  • Older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 642.9% higher power demand at 260W vs 35W.

RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

2024

Why buy it

  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
  • 33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
  • Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 35W instead of 260W, a 225W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 3000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (64 vs 576), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 13.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $800 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro RTX 3000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 41.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile instead at 11,162 vs 10,858, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 6 GB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with DLSS 4 Super Resolution (2025) and DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025), while Quadro RTX 3000 is limited to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 12nm, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2018. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro RTX 3000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro RTX 3000 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro RTX 3000 vs RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro RTX 3000

The Quadro RTX 3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,858 points. Launch price was $9,999.

NVIDIA

RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 26 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 2025 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,162 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro RTX 3000 scores 10,858 and the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile reaches 11,162 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 3000 is built on Turing while the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 2,048 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Raw compute: 16.31 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 8.294 TFLOPS (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 2025 MHz. Ray tracing: 72 RT cores (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 16 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) with 576 Tensor cores vs 64.

FeatureQuadro RTX 3000RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
G3D Mark Score
10,858
11,162+3%
Architecture
Turing
Ada Lovelace
Process Node
12 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
4608+125%
2048
Compute (TFLOPS)
16.31 TFLOPS+97%
8.294 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
2025 MHz+14%
ROPs
96+200%
32
TMUs
288+350%
64
L1 Cache
4.5 MB+125%
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
12 MB+100%
Ray Tracing Cores
72+350%
16
Tensor Cores
576+800%
64

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Quadro RTX 3000 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the Quadro RTX 3000 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.

FeatureQuadro RTX 3000RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
DLSS 4 Super Resolution
Frame Generation
Not Supported
DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction
No
Yes (DLSS 4)
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro RTX 3000 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile carries 8 GB. RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 3000 and 64-bit on the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 12 MB (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) — the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro RTX 3000RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
VRAM Capacity
6 GB
8 GB+33%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit+300%
64-bit
L2 Cache
6 MB
12 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 12 (12_2) (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureQuadro RTX 3000RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
DirectX
12.1
12 (12_2)
Vulkan
1.0
1.4+40%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 3000) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile).

FeatureQuadro RTX 3000RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
Encoder
7th Gen NVENC
8th Gen NVENC
Decoder
5th Gen NVDEC
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro RTX 3000 draws 260W versus the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile's 35W — a 152.5% difference. The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 500W (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.

FeatureQuadro RTX 3000RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
TDP
260W
35W-87%
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
80°C-6%
Perf/Watt
41.8
318.9+663%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile (2024 vs 2018).

FeatureQuadro RTX 3000RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
MSRP
$800
Codename
TU102
AD107
Release
August 13 2018
February 26 2024
Ranking
#78
#254

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.