G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro RTX 3000 vs RTX A1000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro RTX 3000 vs RTX A1000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro RTX 3000

2018

Why buy it

✅63.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌
6.8% HIGHER MSRP
$800 MSRPvs$749 MSRP
❌420% higher power demand at 260W vs 50W.

RTX A1000

2024

Why buy it

✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($749 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 50W instead of 260W, a 210W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 3000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro RTX 3000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 63.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.4% in PassMark G3D (10,858 vs 10,814), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RTX A1000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 6 GB of VRAM, a 8nm process instead of 12nm, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2018. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RTX A1000 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $51 cheaper on MSRP at $749 vs $800, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 6.4% (14.4 vs 13.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro RTX 3000 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro RTX 3000 vs RTX A1000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro RTX 3000

The Quadro RTX 3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,858 points. Launch price was $9,999.

RTX A1000

The RTX A1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 727 MHz to 1462 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,814 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro RTX 3000 scores 10,858 and the RTX A1000 reaches 10,814 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 3000 is built on Turing while the RTX A1000 uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 2,304 (RTX A1000). Raw compute: 16.31 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 6.737 TFLOPS (RTX A1000). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 1462 MHz. Ray tracing: 72 RT cores (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 18 (RTX A1000) with 576 Tensor cores vs 72.

Feature	Quadro RTX 3000	RTX A1000
G3D Mark Score	10,858	10,814
Architecture	Turing	Ampere
Process Node	12 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	4608+100%	2304
Compute (TFLOPS)	16.31 TFLOPS+142%	6.737 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1770 MHz+21%	1462 MHz
ROPs	96+200%	32
TMUs	288+300%	72
L1 Cache	4.5 MB+96%	2.3 MB
L2 Cache	6 MB+200%	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	72+300%	18
Tensor Cores	576+700%	72

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX A1000 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the Quadro RTX 3000 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.

Feature	Quadro RTX 3000	RTX A1000
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro RTX 3000 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A1000 carries 8 GB. RTX A1000 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 3000 and 128-bit on the RTX A1000. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 2 MB (RTX A1000) — the Quadro RTX 3000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro RTX 3000	RTX A1000
VRAM Capacity	6 GB	8 GB+33%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	6 MB+200%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 12.2 (RTX A1000). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro RTX 3000	RTX A1000
DirectX	12.1	12.2
Vulkan	1.0	1.3+30%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A1000). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 3000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A1000).

Feature	Quadro RTX 3000	RTX A1000
Encoder	7th Gen NVENC	7th Gen NVENC
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro RTX 3000 draws 260W versus the RTX A1000's 50W — a 135.5% difference. The RTX A1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 500W (RTX A1000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 163mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.

Feature	Quadro RTX 3000	RTX A1000
TDP	260W	50W-81%
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	163mm
Height	0mm	69mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	85°C	75°C-12%
Perf/Watt	41.8	216.3+417%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro RTX 3000 came in at $800, while the RTX A1000 launched at $749. On MSRP, RTX A1000 was 6.4% cheaper ($51 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 13.6 (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 14.4 (RTX A1000) — the RTX A1000 offers 5.9% better value. The newer card here is RTX A1000 (2024 vs 2018).

Feature	Quadro RTX 3000	RTX A1000
MSRP	$800	$749-6%
Performance per Dollar	13.6	14.4+6%
Codename	TU102	GA107
Release	August 13 2018	April 16 2024
Ranking	#78	#251

Search Quadro RTX 3000 on Amazon

Search RTX A1000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.