G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro RTX 3000 vs RTX A1000 Embedded GPU FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro RTX 3000 vs RTX A1000 Embedded GPU: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro RTX 3000

2018

Why buy it

✅76.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌642.9% higher power demand at 260W vs 35W.

RTX A1000 Embedded GPU

2022

Why buy it

✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 35W instead of 260W, a 225W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 3000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 13.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $800 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro RTX 3000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 76.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward RTX A1000 Embedded GPU instead at 11,009 vs 10,858, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RTX A1000 Embedded GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 6 GB of VRAM, a 8nm process instead of 12nm, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2018. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro RTX 3000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro RTX 3000 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RTX A1000 Embedded GPU has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro RTX 3000 vs RTX A1000 Embedded GPU Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro RTX 3000

The Quadro RTX 3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,858 points. Launch price was $9,999.

RTX A1000 Embedded GPU

The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 630 MHz to 1140 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,009 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro RTX 3000 scores 10,858 and the RTX A1000 Embedded GPU reaches 11,009 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 3000 is built on Turing while the RTX A1000 Embedded GPU uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 2,048 (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 16.31 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 4.669 TFLOPS (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 1140 MHz. Ray tracing: 72 RT cores (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 16 (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU) with 576 Tensor cores vs 64.

Feature	Quadro RTX 3000	RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
G3D Mark Score	10,858	11,009+1%
Architecture	Turing	Ampere
Process Node	12 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	4608+125%	2048
Compute (TFLOPS)	16.31 TFLOPS+249%	4.669 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1770 MHz+55%	1140 MHz
ROPs	96+200%	32
TMUs	288+350%	64
L1 Cache	4.5 MB+125%	2 MB
L2 Cache	6 MB+200%	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	72+350%	16
Tensor Cores	576+800%	64

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the Quadro RTX 3000 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.

Feature	Quadro RTX 3000	RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro RTX 3000 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A1000 Embedded GPU carries 8 GB. RTX A1000 Embedded GPU gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 3000 and 128-bit on the RTX A1000 Embedded GPU. L2 Cache: 6 MB (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 2 MB (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU) — the Quadro RTX 3000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro RTX 3000	RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
VRAM Capacity	6 GB	8 GB+33%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	6 MB+200%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 12.2 (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro RTX 3000	RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
DirectX	12.1	12.2
Vulkan	1.0	1.4+40%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 3000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU).

Feature	Quadro RTX 3000	RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
Encoder	7th Gen NVENC	7th Gen NVENC
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro RTX 3000 draws 260W versus the RTX A1000 Embedded GPU's 35W — a 152.5% difference. The RTX A1000 Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX 3000) vs 500W (RTX A1000 Embedded GPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 82mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.

Feature	Quadro RTX 3000	RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
TDP	260W	35W-87%
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	82mm
Height	0mm	4mm
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	85°C	75°C-12%
Perf/Watt	41.8	314.5+652%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RTX A1000 Embedded GPU (2022 vs 2018).

Feature	Quadro RTX 3000	RTX A1000 Embedded GPU
MSRP	$800	—
Codename	TU102	GA107S
Release	August 13 2018	March 30 2022
Ranking	#78	#246

Search Quadro RTX 3000 on Amazon

Search RTX A1000 Embedded GPU on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.