Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) vs RTX 2000E Ada Generation
Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)
Popular choices:
RTX 2000E Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)
Performance Per Dollar RTX 2000E Ada Generation
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX 2000E Ada Generation.
| Insight | Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Turing / 12nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $692 versus $999 for the RTX 2000E Ada Generation, it costs 31% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 45.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+45.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($692) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($999) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) and RTX 2000E Ada Generation
Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)
The Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1035 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,372 points.
RTX 2000E Ada Generation
The RTX 2000E Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 2130 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 22 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,252 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) scores 15,372 and the RTX 2000E Ada Generation reaches 15,252 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) is built on Turing while the RTX 2000E Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)) vs 2,816 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Raw compute: 9.492 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)) vs 12 TFLOPS (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 1545 MHz vs 2130 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)) vs 22 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) with 384 Tensor cores vs 88.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,372 | 15,252 |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+9% | 2816 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 9.492 TFLOPS | 12 TFLOPS+26% |
| Boost Clock | 1545 MHz | 2130 MHz+38% |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 192+118% | 88 |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+7% | 2.8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 12 MB+200% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48+118% | 22 |
| Tensor Cores | 384+336% | 88 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 16 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)) vs 12 MB (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) — the RTX 2000E Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 12 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)) vs 12.2 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP10 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7.0 | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP10 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) draws 110W versus the RTX 2000E Ada Generation's 70W — a 44.4% difference. The RTX 2000E Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)) vs 650W (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 167mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 110W | 70W-36% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 167mm |
| Height | 0mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 139.7 | 217.9+56% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) launched at $2299 MSRP and currently averages $692, while the RTX 2000E Ada Generation launched at $999 and now averages $999. The Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) costs 30.7% less ($307 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 22.2 (Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)) vs 15.3 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) — the Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) offers 45.1% better value. The RTX 2000E Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2019).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2299 | $999-57% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $692-31% | $999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.2+45% | 15.3 |
| Codename | TU104 | AD107 |
| Release | May 27 2019 | February 12 2024 |
| Ranking | #181 | #107 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) and RTX 2000E Ada Generation
