
Quadro P6000

Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)
Quadro P6000 vs Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro P6000 vs Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro P6000 vs Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro P6000
2016Why buy it
- ✅9.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅46.5% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (23 GB vs 16 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌2016 hardware with 23 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌160.9% HIGHER MSRP$5,999 MSRPvs$2,299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.6 vs 6.7 G3D/$ ($5,999 MSRP vs $2,299 MSRP).
- ❌127.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 110W.
Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,700 less on MSRP ($2,299 MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 158.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.7 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($2,299 MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Turing on 12nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 250W, a 140W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 23 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro P6000 vs Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro P6000
The Quadro P6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,512 points. Launch price was $5,999.

Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)
The Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1035 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,372 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P6000 scores 15,512 and the Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) reaches 15,372 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P6000 is built on Pascal while the Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Quadro P6000) vs 3,072 (Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 12.63 TFLOPS (Quadro P6000) vs 9.492 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1645 MHz vs 1545 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,512 | 15,372 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840+25% | 3072 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.63 TFLOPS+33% | 9.492 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1645 MHz+6% | 1545 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 240+25% | 192 |
| L1 Cache | 1.4 MB | 3 MB+114% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Quadro P6000 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro P6000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 4 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 4) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P6000 has 23 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) carries 16 GB. Quadro P6000 gives you 46.5% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the Quadro P6000 and 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel). L2 Cache: 3 MB (Quadro P6000) vs 4 MB (Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)) — the Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 23.438 GB+46% | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P6000) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5.0 (2x) (Quadro P6000) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs PureVideo HD VP10. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P6000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)).
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5.0 (2x) | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP8 | PureVideo HD VP10 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P6000 draws 250W versus the Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)'s 110W — a 77.8% difference. The Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro P6000) vs 650W (Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 110W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 62.0 | 139.7+125% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro P6000 came in at $5999, while the Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) launched at $2299. On MSRP, Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) was 61.7% cheaper ($3700 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.6 (Quadro P6000) vs 6.7 (Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)) — the Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) offers 157.7% better value. The newer card here is Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5999 | $2299-62% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.6 | 6.7+158% |
| Codename | GP102 | TU104 |
| Release | October 1 2016 | May 27 2019 |
| Ranking | #141 | #181 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















